Other Statutes Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Faour Fraihat, et al v. U.S. Immigration and Customs E, et al
as 21-55941
Plaintiff / Appellee: FAOUR ABDALLAH FRAIHAT, MARCO MONTOYA AMAYA, RAUL ALCOCER CHAVEZ and others
Defendant / Appellant: U.S. IMMIGRATION AND CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, KEVIN K. MCALEENAN, in his official capacity as Acting Secretary, U.S. Department of Homeland Security and others
Faour Fraihat, et al v. U.S. Immigration and Customs E, et al
as 20-56297
Plaintiff / Appellee: RUBEN DARIO MENCIAS SOTO, ALEX HERNANDEZ, ARISTOTELES SANCHEZ MARTINEZ and others
Defendant / Appellant: CHAD F. WOLF, DAVID P. PEKOSKE, JACKI BECKER KLOPP and others
Jose Antonio Franco-Gonzalez v. Janet Napolitano et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2010cv02211
Respondent: Eric H. Holder, Jr., Janet Napolitano, John T. Morton and others
Petitioner: Maksim Zhalezny, Jonas Woldemariam, Juan Carlos Sepulveda-Perez and others
Interested Party: Kevin Lapp and Katherine Byrne Mahoney
Special Master: A Howard Matz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241
Faour Fraihat, et al v. U.S. Immigration and Customs E, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 20-55634
Plaintiff / Appellee: RUBEN DARIO MENCIAS SOTO, ALEX HERNANDEZ, ARISTOTELES SANCHEZ MARTINEZ and others
Defendant / Appellant: CHAD F. WOLF, DAVID P. PEKOSKE, JACKI BECKER KLOPP and others
Arshdeep Singh v. USDHS, et al
as 20-55250
Respondent / Appellee: CARLA L. PROVOST, Chief, U.S. CBP, DONNA P. CAMPAGNOLO, District Director, Los Angeles District Office, U.S. CIS, WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General, Attorney General of the United States and others
Petitioner / Appellant: ARSHDEEP SINGH
Pereira Brito, et al v. Barr, et al
as 20-1119
Petitioner: GILBERTO PEREIRA BRITO, individually and on behalf of all those similarly situated, FLORENTIN AVILA LUCAS, Individually and on behalf of all those similarly situated and JACKY CELICOURT, Individually and on behalf of all those similarly situated
Interested Party: JOHN A. HAWKINSON
Respondent: CHRISTOPHER BRACKETT, Superintendent of the Strafford County Department of Corrections, ANTONE MONIZ, Superintendent of the Plymouth County Correctional Facility, YOLANDA SMITH, Superintendent of the Suffolk County House of Corrections and others
Respondent / Appellee: JAMES MCHENRY, Attorney General, U.S. Department of Justice, YOLANDA SMITH, Attorney General, U.S. Department of Justice, LORI STREETER, Attorney General, U.S. Department of Justice and others
Sahil Sahil v. USDHS, et al
as 20-55028
Respondent / Appellee: CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, IRENE MARTIN and others
Petitioner / Appellant: SAHIL SAHIL
Pereira Brito, et al v. Barr, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 20-1037
Respondent / Appellee: ANTONE MONIZ, Superintendent of the Plymouth County Correctional Facility, CHRISTOPHER BRACKETT, Superintendent of the Strafford County Department of Corrections, LORI STREETER, Superintendent of the Franklin County House of Corrections and others
Interested Party: JOHN A. HAWKINSON
Petitioner / Appellant: JACKY CELICOURT, individually and on behalf of all those similarly situated, GILBERTO PEREIRA BRITO, individually and on behalf of all those similarly situated, FLORENTINE AVILA LUCAS, individually and on behalf of all those similarly situated and others
Paula Mendez Medina v. USDHS, et al
as 19-71989
Not Classified By Court: In re: PAULA MENDEZ MEDINA
Respondent: WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, TIMOTHY S. ROBBINS, Field Office Director of the Adelanto Detention Facility and others
Petitioner: PAULA MENDEZ MEDINA
Roberto Barajas v. United States of America Corporation et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2015cv03225
Defendant: Daniel B. Ackerman, Hilda Avila, Adam Jason Axelrad and others
Plaintiff: Roberto Barajas

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?