Cases 21 - 30 of 58
In re: Herbal Supplements Marketing and Sales Practices Litigation
as 1:2015cv05070
Plaintiff:
Louetta Schulze, Thomas Moors, John Hollis and others
Defendant:
Walgreen Co., General Nutrition Corp., Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. and others
In Re:
In re: Herbal Supplements Marketing and Sales Practices Litigation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Turner v. Unknown Nurses et al
as 1:2015cv01101
Plaintiff:
Johnnie Turner
Defendant:
Unknown Nurses, . Tinsley, Unknown CMT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Titus v. Lee et al
as 1:2015cv01046
Plaintiff:
Richard Titus
Defendant:
W. Lee, J. Lisle and Jennifer Tinsley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Graham v. Dalton et al
as 1:2014cv01359
Plaintiff:
Marvin Graham
Defendant:
Dalton, Robinson, Kram and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fallon v. Pfister et al
as 1:2014cv01345
Plaintiff:
Jeremiah Fallon
Defendant:
. Pfister, . Hobart, . Transcoso and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ball v. Wexford Health Sources, Inc. et al
as 1:2014cv01281
Plaintiff:
Xavier Ball
Defendant:
Wexford Health Sources, Inc., Randy Pfister, Annabel Mottelier and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BoClaire v. Godinez et al
as 1:2014cv01147
Plaintiff:
Val BoClaire
Defendant:
S A Godinez, David Lingle, Lance Tinsley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tinsley et al v. Barney et al
as 3:2014cv00100
Plaintiff:
Richard Tinsley and Tracy L. Tinsley Deckard
Defendant:
John M. Barney, Federal Express Corporation, Fedex Express Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Knox v. French et al
as 1:2013cv01574
Plaintiff:
Christopher Knox
Defendant:
George French, Ms. Mathis, Mr. Torrez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tinsley v. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals Inc. et al
as 3:2013cv51748
Plaintiff:
Curtis Tinsley
Defendant:
Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals Inc. and Boehringer Ingelheim International GmbH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
