Cases filed in Pennsylvania
Cases 1 - 10 of 37
TINSLEY v. UNUM LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA
as 2:2022cv05116
Plaintiff: TERRENCE TINSLEY
Defendant: UNUM LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2021cv03246
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TINSLEY v. MOUZON et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2020cv01060
Defendant: CITY OF PHILADELPHIA and OFFICER JOHN MOUZON
Plaintiff: QAMAR TINSLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TINSLEY v. COURT OF COMMON PLEAS et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2019cv01206
Respondent: COURT OF COMMON PLEAS, MR. LAWRENCE S. KRASNER and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF: PENNSYLVANIA
Petitioner: RUSSELL A. TINSLEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
TINSLEY v. SCHUCK et al
as 2:2017cv05190
Plaintiff: DOUGLAS TINSLEY
Defendant: JAMES F. SCHUCK, CITY OF PHILADELPHIA and JANE/JOHN DOES 1-25
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TINSLEY v. LAING
as 2:2017cv03824
Plaintiff: KATRISHA TINSLEY
Defendant: MATTHEW LAING, SR.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Tinsley v. Bittenbender We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2016cv02505
Plaintiff: Theodore Tinsley
Defendant: Kevin Bittenbender
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
COHEN v. TINSLEY et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2016mc00210
Plaintiff: JEFFREY COHEN
Defendant: JOHN TINSLEY and REGULATORY INSURANCE SERVICES, INC.
Cause Of Action: Motion for Order
FAGAN v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2016cv03237
Plaintiff: TINSLEY FAGAN
Defendant: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0157
Tinsley v. Perdue We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2015cv01296
Petitioner: Theodore Tinsley
Respondent: R.A. Perdue
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?