Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Chandler v. Tipton Correctional Center Staff et al
as 2:2021cv04210
Plaintiff:
Kevin T Chandler
Defendant:
Tipton Correctional Center Staff, Derrick R Ebeirus, Emily Anderson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Michael Holiway v. Tipton Correctional Center
as 19-1722
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Michael D. Holiway
Defendant / Appellee:
Tipton Correctional Center
Holiway v. Tipton Correctional Center
as 2:2019cv04036
Plaintiff:
Michael David Holiway
Defendant:
Tipton Correctional Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Holiway v. Tipton Correctional Center
as 4:2019cv00134
Plaintiff:
Michael David Holiway
Defendant:
Tipton Correctional Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hill v. State of Missouri et al
as 2:2017cv04056
Plaintiff:
Odell Hill
Defendant:
State of Missouri, Missouri Department of Corrections, Corizon Health Services and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mahone v. State of Missouri et al
as 2:2016cv04323
Plaintiff:
Michael Andre Mahone
Defendant:
State of Missouri, Missouri Department of Corrections, Chad Thompson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Yarbrough v. Tipton Correctional Center et al
as 2:2016cv04197
Plaintiff:
Donnielye L Yarbrough
Defendant:
Tipton Correctional Center, Tipton Correctional Center Medical Doctor and Missouri Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sybert v. Lombardi et al
as 2:2014cv04332
Plaintiff:
John Franklin Sybert
Defendant:
George Lombardi, Dave Dormire, Douglas Prudden and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Parnell v. Tipton Correctional Center
as 2:2014cv04297
Plaintiff:
Taddius Parnell
Defendant:
Tipton Correctional Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Parnell v. Tipton Correctional Center
as 1:2014cv00160
Plaintiff:
Taddius Parnell
Defendant:
Tipton Correctional Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
