Cases 1 - 10 of 23
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2024cv00924
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Employment Discrimination (Sex)
In re: Tivity Health, Inc., et al
as 23-504
Petitioner:
In re: TIVITY HEALTH, INC., DONATO TRAMUTO, ADAM C. HOLLAND and others
Respondent:
SHEET METAL WORKERS LOCAL NO. 33, CLEVELAND DISTRICT, PENSION FUND, ROBERT STROUGO and EDWARD BAUER
In re: Tivity Health, Inc., et al
as 22-0502
Petitioner:
In re: TIVITY HEALTH, INC., DONATO TRAMUTO, ADAM C. HOLLAND and others
Respondent:
SHEET METAL WORKERS LOCAL NO. 33, CLEVELAND DISTRICT, PENSION FUND and ROBERT STROUGO
Smith v. Tivity Health, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv04665
Plaintiff:
Edward Smith
Defendant:
Tivity Health, Inc., Richard M. Ashworth, Anthony M. Sanfilippo and others
Wilson v. Tivity Health, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv00717
Plaintiff:
Jordan Wilson
Defendant:
Tivity Health, Inc., Richard Ashworth, Anthony M. Sanfilippo and others
Waterman v. Tivity Health, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv03140
Plaintiff:
Marc Waterman
Defendant:
Tivity Health, Inc., Anthony M. Sanfilippo, Richard Ashworth and others
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 22 Securities Fraud
Hopkins v. Tivity Health Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv02992
Plaintiff:
Matthew Hopkins
Defendant:
Tivity Health Inc., Anthony M. Sanfilippo, Richard Ashworth and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv01917
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Stein v. Tivity Health, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv03832
Plaintiff:
Shiva Stein
Defendant:
Tivity Health, Inc., Richard Ashworth, Anthony M. Sanfilippo and others
Ridenour v. Tivity Health, Inc. et al
as 1:2020cv00973
Defendant:
Benjamin A. Kirshner, Robert J. Greczyn, Jr., Beth M. Jacob and others
Nominal Defendant:
Tivity Health, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Mark Ridenour
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
