Cases 1 - 10 of 39
Pham v. Damon et al
as 1:2024cv01250
Defendant:
The York Area Regional Police Commission, Police Chief Timothy L. Damon and Police Officer Tyler Vanwyk
Plaintiff:
Thuy Thi Pham
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Van-Truong v. Ngoc-Thi-Dinh
as 1:2024cv01205
Defendant:
Dung Ngoc-Thi-Dinh
Plaintiff:
Hai Van-Truong
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01525
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv04431
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
BURNS et al v. SAFECO INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA
as 2:2023cv04178
Plaintiff:
GUENTHER BURNS and HAI THI BURNS
Defendant:
SAFECO INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA agent of LIBERTY MUTUAL GROUP INC doing business as AMERICAN STATES INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv04895
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
DUONG v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 2:2022cv01471
Plaintiff:
ANH DAO THI DUONG
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY and KILOLO KIJAKAZI
Nguyen v. STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY
as 2:2020cv02660
Defendant:
STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY
Plaintiff:
Mai Thi Nguyen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HUYNH v. GREYHOUND LINES, INC. et al
as 2:2018cv02128
Plaintiff:
THI TICH HUYNH
Defendant:
GREYHOUND LINES, INC. and JOHN DOE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MAURER et al v. TRAN et al
as 2:2018cv01514
Plaintiff:
RICHARD W. MAURER and DAWN SCHRENK-MAURER
Defendant:
THI THI KIM TRAN, VI TRAN and LIEN TRAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
