Cases 1 - 10 of 169
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00181
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv22424
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv01532
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
EBIN NEW YORK, INC. v. R&B COLLECTION INC.
as 1:2023cv04201
Plaintiff:
EBIN NEW YORK, INC.
Defendant:
R&B COLLECTION INC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
EBIN NEW YORK, INC. v. R&B COLLECTION INC.
as 2:2023cv04201
Plaintiff:
EBIN NEW YORK, INC.
Defendant:
R&B COLLECTION INC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv01384
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv02510
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Quantum Technology Innovations, LLC v. The Criterion Collection Inc.
as 1:2022cv00582
Plaintiff:
Quantum Technology Innovations, LLC
Defendant:
The Criterion Collection Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
KRAKOWIECKI et al v. WALKER et al
as 2:2022cv00518
Defendant:
CHARLES CHRISTIAN WALKER, SEWING COLLECTION INC., CHARLES C. WALKER and others
Plaintiff:
MELISSA KRAKOWIECKI and MATTHEW KRAKOWIECKI
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv04793
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
