Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Sparks II v. Ridgefield Police Dept., et al
as 3:2022cv00876
Plaintiff:
Tod M. Sparks, II
Defendant:
Ridgefield Police Dept., Ralph T. Webdale, Union Savings Bank and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Sparks v. Danbury Superior Court, et al
as 3:2022cv00844
Plaintiff:
Tod M. Sparks, II
Defendant:
Judges/Clerks/Police and Danbury Superior Court
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Sparks v. States Attorney, et al
as 3:2022cv00846
Petitioner:
Tod Matthew Sparks, II
Respondent:
Office of States Attorney and Judicial District of Danbury
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Crispin v. Walker et al
as 3:2021cv00886
Defendant:
John Doe, Nick Rodriguez, Craig Burns and others
Plaintiff:
Jossean Crispin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Eichelberger v. Boogs et al
as 3:2014cv00665
Plaintiff:
Purvis Vernell Eichelberger
Defendant:
Tod Boogs, Andrew C. Jackson, Antoine Viollette and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Steiger v. Pannella et al
as 3:2014cv00120
Plaintiff:
Eric K. Steiger
Defendant:
Lea Pannella, Kelly Quijano, Francis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Macellaio v. Mulhall et al
as 3:2012cv01674
Plaintiff:
Brooklyn Macellaio
Defendant:
Richard Mulhall, Jeanine Allin, Arkadiusz Petlik and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ramos v. Quiros et al
as 3:2011cv01616
Plaintiff:
Miguel Ramos
Defendant:
Angel Quiros, Scott Semple, Erfe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hines v. Ducate et al
as 3:2011cv01286
Plaintiff:
Danny Hines
Defendant:
Susan Ducate, Robert Berger, Tod Bogdonoff and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Batts v. Lantz et al
as 3:2009cv01196
Plaintiff:
Charles Batts
Defendant:
Theresa Lantz, Thomas Kocienda, K. Matthews and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
