Cases 1 - 10 of 48
Snow et al v. Etowah County Sheriffs Department et al
as 4:2020cv00344
Defendant:
Jonathan Horton, Todd Entrekin, Etowah County and others
Plaintiff:
Gabriel Andre Hill, Gregory Marcus Snow, Shawnta Sanders and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Maling v. Laska et al
as 3:2019cv01076
Defendant:
Michael L. Taylor, Ronald D. Vitiello, Patrick O'Brien and others
Plaintiff:
Ezra Dave Gipan Maling
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Maling v. Laska et al
as 4:2019cv00313
Defendant:
Matthew T Albence, Kevin Demerin, Mitchell Rose and others
Plaintiff:
Ezra Dave Gipan Maling
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Moore v. Entrekin et al
as 4:2018cv00224
Plaintiff:
Corion Leshon Moore
Defendant:
Todd Entrekin, Scott Hassell, Keith Peek and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Corion Moore v. Todd Entrekin, et al
as 17-15304
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CORION LESHON MOORE
Defendant - Appellee:
TODD ENTREKIN, Sheriff, SCOTT HASSELL, Chief, N. EXFORD, Deputy and others
Baise v. Entrekin et al
as 4:2017cv01416
Petitioner:
Robert Baise, Jr.
Respondent:
Todd Entrekin and Attorney General of the State of Alabama, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Cole v. Entrekin et al
as 4:2017cv00091
Plaintiff:
Aaron Cordero Cole
Defendant:
Todd Entrekin, Scott Hassell, Deputy Exford and others
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney 4
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Moore v. Entrekin et al
as 4:2017cv00092
Plaintiff:
Corion Leshon Moore
Defendant:
Todd Entrekin, Scott Hassell, N Exford and others
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney 1
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rudolph Polson v. State of Alabama, et al
as 16-16883
Petitioner - Appellant:
RUDOLPH POLSON
Respondent - Appellee:
STATE OF ALABAMA, SCOTT HASSELL, Chief Deputy of Detention, ATTORNEY GENERAL STATE OF ALABAMA and others
Lewis v. Entrekin et al
as 4:2016cv00254
Plaintiff:
Christopher Lamont Lewis
Defendant:
Todd Entrekin, Scott Hassell, Mike O'Bryant and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
