Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Dial v. Dichter et al
as 1:2024cv02648
Plaintiff:
Keith Dial
Defendant:
Kenneth Dichter, Todd Smith, David Adelman and others
Lang v. Dichter et al
as 1:2023cv08316
Plaintiff:
Jesse A. Lang
Defendant:
Kenneth Dichter, Todd Smith, George Mattson and others
Irminger v. Dichter et al
as 1:2023cv06777
Plaintiff:
Philip Irminger
Defendant:
Kenneth Dichter, Todd Smith, David Adelman and others
The Lee Goodman Trust v. Wheels Up Experience Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv02900
Plaintiff:
The Lee Goodman Trust
Defendant:
Wheels Up Experience Inc., Kenneth Dichter and Todd Smith
Smith v. Thompson
as 1:2021cv02456
Defendant:
Terry Thompson
Plaintiff:
Cornelius Todd Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Finitz et al v. O'Rourke et al
as 1:2018cv09640
Defendant:
Barry Honig, John R O'Rourke, Andrew J Kaplan and others
Plaintiff:
Todd Smith, Kyle Irvine and Christopher Finitz
Nominal Defendant:
Riot Blockchain, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Robertson v. Fahey et al
as 5:2012cv00546
Plaintiff:
Malik Robertson
Defendant:
Joseph E. Fahey, James Delay and Todd Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Akhenaten v. Najee, L.L.C.
as 11-2933
Plaintiff:
Seabiau, LLC., FKA FB Entertainment, LLC. and Seauabi, LLC
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Pharo Naji Akhenaten
Defendant - Appellee:
Najee, L.L.C., a foreign Delaware Corporation formed in New York, Najee, Inc., James Todd Smith, AKA LL Cool J and others
Akhenaten v. Najee, L.L.C.
as 11-789
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Pharo Naji Akhenaten
Defendant - Appellee:
Najee, L.L.C., a foreign Delaware Corporation formed in New York, Najee, Inc., James Todd Smith, AKA LL Cool J and others
Akhenaten v. Najee, L.L.C et al
as 1:2007cv00970
Plaintiff:
Pharo Naji Akhenaten
Defendant:
Najee, L.L.C, Najee, L.L.C, Najee, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
