Cases 1 - 10 of 44
Tolliver v. Thomas et al
as 1:2024cv02046
Plaintiff:
Anton Tolliver
Defendant:
Anoop Thomas, John Doe and City of New York
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv07703
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1201 Civil Rights (Disability)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv08902
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Davis et al v. 3M Company (f/k/a Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing, Co) et al
as 1:2023cv08047
Plaintiff:
Tyress Davis, Chad Fisher, Joseph Golon Jr and others
Defendant:
3M Company (f/k/a Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing, Co), AGC Chemicals Americas Inc., Amerex Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 nr Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv05085
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Abbott et al v. Comme Des Garcons, Ltd. et al
as 1:2021cv04929
Plaintiff:
David Unich, Carlin Rollenhagen, Winston Tolliver and others
Defendant:
Elaine Beuther, Dover Street Market New York LLC, James Gilchrist and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Tolliver v. Capra
as 9:2021cv00061
Petitioner:
Eric Tolliver
Respondent:
Michael Capra
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Tolliver v. Capra
as 1:2020cv11133
Petitioner:
Eric Tolliver
Respondent:
Michael Capra
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv03701
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 cv
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv03616
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 cv
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
