Cases 1 - 10 of 365
Childress et al v. City of Cincinnati, Ohio et al
as 1:2024cv00214
Plaintiff:
Akil Childress, Emma Sue Long, Charlene Berkhalter and others
Defendant:
City of Cincinnati, Ohio, Jan-Michele Lemon Kearney, Victoria Parks and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hatten v. Elkin et al
as 2:2024cv01102
Plaintiff:
Arlene F. Hatten
Defendant:
Tom Elkin, John Hinton, Davis Homer and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
King v. Watson
as 3:2024cv00387
Petitioner:
Richard N. King
Respondent:
Warden Tom Watson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Garland v. Mason et al.
as 4:2024cv00298
Plaintiff:
Jason Milford Garland
Defendant:
Major Daniel Mason, Chaplin Tom and Sergeant Maynard
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Schultz v. Hanculak et al.
as 1:2024cv00224
Plaintiff:
Richard Schultz
Defendant:
Tom Hanculak and Anne Walton Keller
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Bennett v. Vilsack et al
as 2:2024cv00430
Plaintiff:
Brina Bennett
Defendant:
Tom Vilsack, Cindy Long, State Of Ohio and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Carter v. Watson
as 3:2024cv00198
Petitioner:
Terrez L. Carter
Respondent:
Warden Tom Watson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Alford v. Schweitzer et al
as 2:2024cv00194
Plaintiff:
Brian Keith Alford
Defendant:
Warden Tom Schweitzer, Mr. C. Cann, Mr. Z. Gould and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Schubert v. Watson
as 2:2023cv04231
Petitioner:
Alan Schubert
Respondent:
Warden Tom Watson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Fenderson v. Management & Training Corp. et al.
as 3:2023cv02119
Plaintiff:
Tayke Fenderson
Defendant:
Management & Training Corp., Warden Tom Watson, Daniel Price and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
