Cases 1 - 10 of 24
Gibson v. Abramson et al
as 3:2009cv00685
Plaintiff:
Cory Gibson
Defendant:
Jerry Abramson, Steve Beshear, Mark E. Bolton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gibson v. Abramson et al
as 1:2009cv00685
Plaintiff:
Cory Gibson
Defendant:
Jerry Abramson, Steve Beshear, Mark E. Bolton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gallo v. Louisville Metro Government et al
as 3:2009cv00223
Plaintiff:
Heidi Gallo
Defendant:
Louisville Metro Government, Correctional Medical Services, Inc., Tom Campbell and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
O'Neal v. Rone et al
as 3:2008cv00468
Plaintiff:
Antonio Devon O'Neal
Defendant:
G. Rone and Tom Campbell
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Gregg v. Louisville Metro Government et al
as 3:2008cv00604
Plaintiff:
Robert Gregg
Defendant:
Louisville Metro Government, Tom Campbell and Prison Health Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Thomas v. Jefferson County Corrections et al
as 3:2008cv00032
Plaintiff:
Stephen E. Thomas, Jr.
Defendant:
Jefferson County Corrections, Tom Campbell, Medical Director and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
O'Neal v. McFerley et al
as 3:2008cv00459
Plaintiff:
Antonio Devon O'Neal
Defendant:
McFerley and Tom Campbell
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Ellis v. Campbell et al
as 3:2008cv00458
Plaintiff:
Curtis Renee Ellis
Defendant:
Tom Campbell, Jefferson County Department of Corrections and Medical Staff of Jefferson County Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Martin v. Louisville Metro Government et al
as 3:2008cv00521
Plaintiff:
Victor Martin
Defendant:
Louisville Metro Government, Jerry Abramson, Louisville Metro Police Dept. and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Maynard v. Campbell
as 3:2008cv00505
Plaintiff:
Timothy DeWayne Maynard
Defendant:
Tom Campbell
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
