Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Giles v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 2:2017cv03517
Plaintiff:
Tom Giles
Defendant:
C R Bard Incorporated and Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MARKS v. DOES et al
as 3:2009cv05489
Plaintiff:
Antolin Andrew Marks
Defendant:
John and Jane Does, BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF GEO GROUP, GEO GROUP INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MARKS v. DOES et al
as 1:2009cv00943
Plaintiff:
ANTOLIN ANDREW MARKS
Defendant:
JOHN AND JANE DOES, BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF GEO GROUP, GEO GROUP INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fofana et al v. Giles et al
as 2:2009cv00324
Petitioner:
Maudo Fofana, Erick Hernandez, Jesus Rangel-Reynel and others
Respondent:
Tom Giles and George Wisen
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Khan v. Giles et al
as 3:2008cv05698
Plaintiff:
Izaz Khan
Defendant:
Tom Giles, George Wigen, Carl Sadler and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Antolin Andrews v. Jennings, et al
as 08-35837
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANTOLIN ANDREW MARKS
Defendant - Appellee:
JENNINGS, Assistant Field Office Director of ICE, JOHN P. TORRES, Director of Detention and Removal Operations of ICE under Department of Homeland Security, NEIL CLARK, District Director ICE and others
De Oca Godinez v. Giles et al
as 3:2008cv05601
Plaintiff:
Jesus Montes De Oca Godinez
Defendant:
Tom Giles, George Wigen and Dale Nelson
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Marks v. Jennings et al
as 3:2008mc05045
Plaintiff:
Antolin Andrew Marks
Defendant:
Jennings, John P Torres, Neil Clark and others
Marks v. McCluskey et al
as 3:2008cv05151
Plaintiff:
Antolin Andrew Marks
Defendant:
Alissa McCluskey, Tom Giles, Mr. Jannings and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Marks v. Bennett et al
as 3:2007cv05674
Plaintiff:
Antolin Andrew Marks
Defendant:
Jack Bennett, George Wigen, Tom Giles and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
