Cases 1 - 6 of 6
Apache Stronghold v. USA, et al
as 21-15295
Defendant / Appellee:
NEIL BOSWORTH, Supervisor, USDA Forest Service, Tonto National Forest, TOM TORRES, Acting Supervisor, USDA Forest Service, Tonto National Forest, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
APACHE STRONGHOLD, a 501(c)(3) nonprofit organization
Amicus Curiae:
RELIGIOUS LIBERTY LAW SCHOLARS, NATIONAL CONGRESS OF AMERICAN INDIANS, A TRIBAL ELDER, AND OTHER FEDERAL INDIAN LAW SCHOLARS AND ORGANIZATIONS, JEWISH COALITION FOR RELIGIOUS LIBERTY, THE INTERNATIONAL SOCIETY FOR KRISHNA CONSCIOUSNESS, THE SIKH COALITION, AND PROTECT THE 1st and others
Arizona Mining Reform Coalition et al v. United States Forest Service et al
as 2:2021cv00122
Plaintiff:
Earthworks, Arizona Mining Reform Coalition, Access Fund and others
Defendant:
United States Forest Service, Neil Bosworth and Tom Torres
Intervenor Defendant:
Resolution Copper Mining LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4321
San Carlos Apache Tribe v. United States Forest Service et al
as 2:2021cv00068
Plaintiff:
San Carlos Apache Tribe
Defendant:
United States Forest Service, Tom Torres and Neil Bosworth
Intervenor Defendant:
Resolution Copper Mining, LLC and Resolution Copper Mining LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4321
Apache Stronghold v. United States of America et al
as 2:2021cv00050
Defendant:
Sonny Perdue, Neil Bosworth, Vicki Christensen and others
Plaintiff:
Apache Stronghold
Amicus Curiae:
MICA Group, Morningstar Institute and Ramon Riley
Intervenor Defendant:
Resolution Copper Mining LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv00896
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
Vargas et al v. Wughalter et al
as 1:2008cv11378
Plaintiff:
Hector Vargas and Alejandrina Vargas
Defendant:
Eric Wughalter, Tom Torres, Martin Blum S.W. Management LLC and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
