Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Tomlinson v. Garza
as 4:2023cv00007
Petitioner:
Mark Tomlinson
Respondent:
Warden Fernando Garza
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Martens v. City of Findlay et al
as 3:2022cv00914
Defendant:
Robison, Curphey & O'Connell, LLC, Corey L. Tomlinson, City of Findlay and others
Plaintiff:
George Martens
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Tomlinson v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2022cv00248
Plaintiff:
Tammy L. Tomlinson
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Chambers et al v. Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company
as 1:2019cv02601
Plaintiff:
Sheena Hill, Wayne Eric Hopper, Patricia L. Chambers and others
Defendant:
Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2019cv00255
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2019cv00375
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv00376
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Tomlinson v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
as 2:2015cv01860
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Diane Tomlinson
Defendant:
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Tomlinson et al v. Renal Treatment Centers-Illinois, Inc.
as 1:2014cv00211
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey B Tomlinson , Amy Leath Tomlinson , Olivia Lynn Tomlinson and others
Defendant:
Renal Treatment Centers-Illinois, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Tomlinson v. Bradshaw
as 5:2013cv01808
Petitioner:
Darren Tomlinson
Respondent:
Margaret Bradshaw
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
