Cases 1 - 10 of 19
HOBBS v. STATE OF FLORIDA et al
as 5:2023cv00298
Petitioner:
OLANDIS DEAN HOBBS
Respondent:
STATE OF FLORIDA, TOMMY FORD, BAY COUNTY JAIL and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
THOMPSON v. FORD et al
as 5:2023cv00221
Plaintiff:
MARQUIS RESHAD THOMPSON
Defendant:
TOMMY FORD, JUSTIN BAILEY and GARZA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DENT v. FORD et al
as 5:2023cv00213
Plaintiff:
ROBERT LEON DENT
Defendant:
TOMMY FORD, TYLER, ZACK VAN DYKE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CREAMER v. FORD et al
as 5:2023cv00139
Plaintiff:
SEAN LEE CREAMER
Defendant:
TOMMY FORD, JEFFERY BENNETT, DAVID HIGGINS, JR and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SEARCY v. BAY COUNTY JAIL FACILITY / ADMINISTRATION AS NAMED
as 5:2023cv00081
Plaintiff:
DAVID LEE SEARCY
Defendant:
BAY COUNTY JAIL FACILITY / ADMINISTRATION AS NAMED, TOMMY FORD, RICK ANGLIN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
OCONNOR v. CLARK et al
as 5:2022cv00270
Plaintiff:
SEAN MICHAEL OCONNOR
Defendant:
BRANTLEY CLARK, JR, DEDEE COSTELLO, JENNIFER LIEB and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WILLIAMS v. FORD
as 5:2022cv00070
Petitioner:
TEE WILLIAMS
Respondent:
TOMMY FORD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
DENT v. BAILEY et al
as 5:2022cv00052
Plaintiff:
ROBERT LEON DENT
Defendant:
CALEB BAILEY, FLOWER and TOMMY FORD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WHITEHEAD v. FORD
as 5:2022cv00006
Petitioner:
NICHOLAS WHITEHEAD
Respondent:
TOMMY FORD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
WHITEHEAD v. STATE OF FLORIDA et al
as 5:2022cv00007
Petitioner:
NICHOLAS WHITEHEAD
Respondent:
STATE OF FLORIDA and TOMMY FORD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
