Cases 1 - 10 of 27
Henry, John v. Florida Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2024cv14055
Plaintiff:
John Henry
Defendant:
Florida Department of Corrections, Johnny Frambo, Michael Morgan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Bowden v. Reddish et al
as 3:2024cv00058
Plaintiff:
Elijah Tamar Bowden
Defendant:
Reddish, Lester Fernandez, H.L. Johnston and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Baker v. Shelly et al
as 2:2023cv00659
Plaintiff:
Mira Baker
Defendant:
Lieutenant Shelly, Warden Robert Mercado, R. Abassa and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Derrick James v. E. Perez-Lugo, et al
as 22-11301
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DERRICK GREGORY JAMES
Defendant / Appellee:
E. PEREZ-LUGO, MICHELLE SCHOUEST and TONI BOWDEN
BOWDEN v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv55837
Plaintiff:
TONY BOWDEN
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bowden v. Kijakazi (CONSENT)
as 2:2021cv00613
Plaintiff:
Tony Bowden
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Daniel Teal v. Jeff Beasley, et al
as 20-13848
Defendant / Appellee:
TONI BOWDEN, G. WELLHAUSEN, LEAVINS and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DANIEL K. TEAL
Daniel Teal v. Attorney General, State of Flo, et al
as 20-12740
Defendant / Appellee:
TONI BOWDEN, Greviance Coordinator Supervisor, SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, G. WELLHAUSEN, Greviance Coordinator and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DANIEL K. TEAL
Baldwin v. Sheehan et al
as 2:2020cv00359
Defendant:
Dr. Ronald Solorzano, Aaron Sheehan, Michelle Schouest and others
Plaintiff:
John Baldwin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Baldwin v. Sheehan et al
as 2:2020cv00122
Defendant:
Dr. Ronald Solorzano, Aaron Sheehan, Michelle Schouest and others
Plaintiff:
John Baldwin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
