Cases
Cases 21 - 30 of 100
Logan v. State of Tennessee et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2013cv00743
Petitioner: Courtney R. Logan
Respondent: State of Tennessee , John (Tony) Howerton and Robert E. Cooper, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Logan v. State of Tennessee et al
as 3:2013mc00062
Petitioner: Courtney R. Logan
Respondent: State of Tennessee, John (Tony) Howerton and Robert E. Cooper, Jr.
In re: Ronald Davi
as 13-5954
Movant: In re: RONALD L. DAVIS
Respondent: TONY HOWERTON, Warden
Sadiq Abdul-Salim v. Darren Settles, et al
as 13-5837
Plaintiff - Appellant: SADIQ HAFIZ ABDUL-SALIM, aka Chester L. Wallace
Defendant - Appellee: REUBEN HODGE, individually and oficially, DARREN SETTLES, individually and officially, TONY HOWERTON, Warden and others
Peterson v. Howerton
as 2:2013cv00113
Petitioner: Terri Lynn Peterson
Respondent: Tony Howerton
Peterson v. Howerton
as 1:2013cv02181
Petitioner: Terri Lynn Peterson
Respondent: Tony Howerton
Bond v. Howerton We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2013cv00416
Petitioner: Joshua Bond
Respondent: Tony Howerton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Timothy Watson v. Ruben Hodge, et al
as 13-5545
Plaintiff - Appellant: TIMOTHY C. WATSON
Defendant: RUBEN HODGE, Commissioner, et al.
Defendant - Appellee: TONY HOWERTON, Warden, Warden and MICHAEL PARRISH, Assistant Warden
Kevin McDougle v. Tony Howerton, Warden
as 2:2013cv02227
Petitioner: Kevin McDougle
Defendant: Tony Howerton, Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Patton v. Howerton et al (TVV) We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2013cv00146
Plaintiff: Jay Patton
Defendant: Tony Howerton, Michael Parrish, Doug Cook and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?