Cases 61 - 70 of 656
Bok Song v. Parker et al
as 3:2021cv00154
Defendant:
Kenneth Bailey, Tony Parker, Lee Dotson and others
Plaintiff:
Young Bok Song
Consolidated Defendant:
(f/n/u) McDaniel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Carlos Wilson v. Tennessee Dept of Correction, et al
as 21-5136
Defendant / Appellee:
COTY HOLLAND, BCCX Grievance Chairperson, in his individual and official capacity, TONY PARKER, Commissioner, in his individual and official capacity, BRETT COBBLE, BCCX Associate Warden of Treatment, in his individual and official capacity and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CARLOS WILSON and CARLOS D. WILSON
Young v. Parker et al
as 2:2021cv00023
Defendant:
Michael Parris, Tony Parker and Edmond Lane
Plaintiff:
Dexter Young
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Holt v. CoreCivic et al
as 3:2021cv00093
Defendant:
Tony Parker, Warden (f/n/u) Byrd, CoreCivic and others
Plaintiff:
Raphale Holt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Darrell Hochhalter v. Tony Parker, et al
as 21-5105
Respondent:
TONY PARKER
Petitioner / Appellant:
DARRELL HOCHHALTER
Respondent / Appellee:
KEVIN MYERS, Acting Warden
Rhule v. Parker et al
as 3:2021cv00067
Defendant:
Ph.D Marina Cadreche, Tony Parker, Kenneth Williams and others
Plaintiff:
Joey D Rhule
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harris v. TDOC Commissioner Tony Parker et al
as 3:2021cv00027
Defendant:
Mike Parris, Stacey Oakes, TDOC Commissioner Tony Parker and others
Plaintiff:
Marquise Harris
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Doe v. Lee et al
as 3:2021cv00028
Defendant:
Tony Parker, William Lee and David Rausch
Plaintiff:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Horton v. Parker et al
as 3:2020cv01114
Plaintiff:
Michael Horton
Defendant:
Tony Parker, Candace Whisman, Lee Dotson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Horton v. Parker et al
as 1:2020cv01283
Plaintiff:
Michael Horton
Defendant:
Tony Parker, Candace Whisman, Lee Dotson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
