Cases 31 - 40 of 120
Knighten v. Stanton et al
as 1:2012cv00717
Plaintiff:
Jamie Lyn Knighten
Defendant:
Ernest Stanton , Charles Daughtry , Anthony Gipson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
May v. Patterson et al
as 1:2012cv00703
Plaintiff:
Deric LaVelle May
Defendant:
Tony Patterson and Ms. White
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Billingsleay v. Patterson et al (INMATE 3)
as 3:2012cv01002
Plaintiff:
Jamet N. Billingsleay
Defendant:
Tony Patterson and Luther Strange
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hammonds v. Patterson (INMATE 3)
as 1:2012cv00935
Plaintiff:
Jerry Hammond
Defendant:
Tony Patterson and Luther Strange
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Derrick Stanberry v. Commissioner, AL DOC, et al
as 12-15212
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DERRICK M. STANBERRY
Defendant - Appellee:
RICHARD ALLEN, TONY PATTERSON, WILLIE COPELAND and others
Griggs v. Thomas et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2012cv00843
Plaintiff:
Arthur Griggs
Defendant:
Kim Tobias Thomas, Luther Strange, Robert Bentley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Owens v. Patterson
as 2:2012cv03491
Petitioner:
Reginald A. Owens
Respondent:
Tony Patterson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Williams v. Patterson et al
as 1:2012cv00592
Plaintiff:
Cory Williams
Defendant:
Tony Patterson, Bennie Ashby and Christopher Earl
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Owens v. Patterson
as 1:2012cv00580
Petitioner:
Reginald A. Owens
Respondent:
Tony Patterson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
McLeod v. Patterson et al (INMATE 3)
as 1:2012cv00772
Plaintiff:
Jackie McLeod
Defendant:
Tony Patterson and Luther Strange
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
