Cases 1 - 10 of 74
Brentrez McPherson v. Georgia Department of Corrections, et al
as 24-10687
Plaintiff:
BRENTREZ MCPHERSON
Defendant:
GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, TYRONE OLIVER, JACOB BEASLEY and others
John Canning v. Trevonza Bobbitt, et al
as 23-13992
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOHN CANNING
Defendant / Appellee:
TREVONZA BOBBITT, JOSH WICKER, DEIDRA EDWARDS and others
Not Classified By Court:
SERVICE
Nathaniel Paige v. Georgia Department of Corrections, et al
as 23-12649
Plaintiff / Appellant:
NATHANIEL PAIGE
Defendant / Appellee:
GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, ROBERT TOOLE, SGT THOMAS, Rutledge State Prison and others
Waseem Daker v. Timothy Ward, et al
as 23-11445
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WASEEM DAKER
Defendant / Appellee:
TIMOTHY WARD, JACK KOON, ROBERT TOOLE and others
Waseem Daker v. Commissioner, Georgia Department of Corrections, et al
as 23-10798
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WASEEM DAKER
Defendant / Appellee:
COMMISSIONER, GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, JACK KOON, STEVE UPON and others
Waseem Daker v. Timothy Ward, et al
as 23-10630
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WASEEM DAKER
Defendant / Appellee:
TIMOTHY WARD, JACK KOON, ROBERT TOOLE and others
Nathan Crisp v. The State of Georgia, et al
as 23-10625
Plaintiff / Appellant:
NATHAN D. CRISP
Defendant / Appellee:
THE STATE OF GEORGIA, SCOT W. SCHUNK, TOOLE and others
Adam Killick v. Harbor Freight Tools USA Inc
as 23-10626
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ADAM KILLICK
Defendant / Appellee:
HARBOR FREIGHT TOOLS USA INC
Dayvon Grant v. Commissioner of the Georgia Department of Correcti, et al
as 23-10395
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAYVON A. GRANT
Defendant / Appellee:
COMMISSIONER OF THE GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, ROBERT TOOLE, KEVIN SPRAYBERRY and others
Waseem Daker v. Brian Owens, et al
as 23-10146
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WASEEM DAKER
Defendant / Appellee:
BRIAN OWENS, RICK JACOBS, ROBERT TOOLE and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
