Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Smith v. US Federal Government Agencies et al
as 5:2022cv00154
Plaintiff:
Margaret Jean Smith
Defendant:
US Federal Government Agencies, Samsung Corp., Overseas, Corp. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Trademark
United States of America v. Westinghouse Mining Circuit Breaker et al
as 5:2021cv00294
Defendant:
Square D Co. Size 2 Starter, Size 3 Starter, Two (2) Eaton 1000 VAC Mining Breakers and others
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Interested Party:
Richard Averson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Complaint for Forfeiture
United States of America v. Westinghouse Mining Circuit Breaker et al
as 5:2021cv00295
Defendant:
Square D Co. Size 2 Starter, Size 3 Starter, Two (2) Eaton 1000 VAC Mining Breakers and others
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Interested Party:
Freddie Ball
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
United States of America v. One Toshiba Satellite Laptop Computer
as 5:2009cv01236
Plaintiff:
United States of America and United States of America
Defendant:
One Toshiba Satellite Laptop Computer, One Toshiba Hard Drive and Miscellaneous Computer Accessories
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 2254 (a)(2) - Forfeiture of property used to commit child pornography offenses
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2007cv00026
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 15 Antitrust Litigation
Loomis v. Cypress Semiconductor Corporation et al
as 3:2007cv00019
Plaintiff:
David Loomis, David Loomis, David Loomis and others
Defendant:
Cypress Semiconductor Corporation, Fujitsu America, Inc., Fujitsu Limited, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Martich v. AU Optronics Corp. America et al
as 5:2007cv00015
Plaintiff:
John Martich and John Martich
Defendant:
AU Optronics Corp. America, CHI MEI Optoelectronics Co., LTD., CHI MEI Optoelectronics USA, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
