Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00001
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv00925
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv00777
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Huffman et al v. Toyota Motor North America, Inc. et al
as 1:2012cv00381
Plaintiff:
Lawrence W Huffman, Patricia L Huffman, Colleen Krause and others
Defendant:
Toyota Motor Corporation, Toyota Motor Engineering & Manufacturing North America, Inc., Toyota Motor North America, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Motor Vehicle Product Liability
USA v. Toyota Tacoma 2006 et al
as 1:2010cv00538
Defendant:
$1,424.75 US Currency, Sugar River Savings Bank Account #123482436 and Toyota Tacoma 2006
Plaintiff:
USA
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881 Forfeiture Property-Drugs
USA v. $40,139.86 US Currency et al
as 1:2010cv00525
Defendant:
$26,000.10 US Currency, $40,139.86 US Currency and Toyota 4Runner 2004
Plaintiff:
USA
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881 Forfeiture Property-Drugs
USA v. Toyota Camry 2009
as 1:2010cv00323
Defendant:
Toyota Camry 2009
Plaintiff:
USA
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881 Forfeiture Property-Drugs
USA v. Toyota Tundra 2002
as 1:2009cv00322
Plaintiff:
USA
Defendant:
Toyota Tundra 2002
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881 Forfeiture Property-Drugs
USA v. Toyota Highlander 2007
as 1:2008cv00519
Plaintiff:
USA
Defendant:
Toyota Highlander 2007
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Plaintiff
USA v. Toyota Avalon 2000
as 1:2007cv00235
Plaintiff:
USA
Defendant:
Toyota Avalon 2000
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881 Forfeiture Property-Drugs
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
