Cases 11 - 20 of 35
John Scott v. Billy Pierce, et al
as 15-20593
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOHN SCOTT
Defendant - Appellee:
BILLY PIERCE, Chaplain-Director-Texas Deprtment of Criminal Justice, AKBAR SHABAZZ, Chaplain-Texas Deprtment of Criminal Justice, KEITH THEDFORD, Chaplain-Texas Deprtment of Criminal Justice and others
Osby v. Stephans et al
as 4:2015cv02801
Plaintiff:
Lord Harlech Osby
Defendant:
William Stephens, Tracy Bailey, Chris LaCox and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Evans v. Texas Department Of Criminal Justice et al
as 4:2015cv02588
Plaintiff:
Leslie Evans
Defendant:
Texas Department Of Criminal Justice, Cornelius Smith, III, Anna Rodriguez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rodriguez v. Livingston et al
as 4:2015cv01939
Plaintiff:
Erik M. Rodriguez
Defendant:
Brad Livingston, Tracy Bailey, Christopher Lacox and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Eagans v. Williams et al
as 4:2015cv00413
Plaintiff:
Richard Eagans
Defendant:
Stephen Williams, Tracy Bailey, Tiffany Bensen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hastings v. Williams et al
as 4:2015cv00239
Plaintiff:
Larry Hastings, Jr.
Defendant:
Jason Williams, Tracy Bailey, Wayne Brewer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ortiz et al v. Juaquine Pope et al.
as 4:2014cv02985
Defendant:
Tracy Bailey, Brad Livingston, Juaquine Pope and others
Plaintiff:
John Doe and Prison Justice League
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Marx v. Bailey
as 4:2014cv02889
Petitioner:
Jeffery Marx
Respondent:
Tracy Bailey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Longoria v. Bailey
as 6:2014cv00660
Petitioner:
Fernando Longoria
Respondent:
Tracy Bailey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Howard v. Bailey et al
as 4:2014cv01865
Plaintiff:
Patrick James Howard
Defendant:
Tracy Bailey, Christopher Lacox, Khair Mott and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
