Cases 1 - 8 of 8
EUCLID v. TRANSPORTATION SECURITY ADMINISTRATION et al
as 2:2023cv04335
Plaintiff:
NATHANIEL EUCLID
Defendant:
TRANSPORTATION SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, TSA/DHS HEADQUARTERS and TSA OAKLAND
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
AIR MARSHAL ASSOCIATION v. SECRETARY OF THE DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY et al
as 2:2022cv02254
Plaintiff:
AIR MARSHAL ASSOCIATION
Defendant:
SECRETARY OF THE DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, SECRETARY OF THE TRANSPORTATION SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, RICHARD F. ALTOMARE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv03078
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2016cv02942
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv05505
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
GEORGE v. REIHL et al
as 2:2010cv00586
Plaintiff:
NICHOLAS GEORGE and NICHOLAS GEORGE
Defendant:
REIHL, RICHARDS, THREE UNKNWON NAMED OFFICERS OR AGENTS OF THE TRANSPORTATION SECURITY ADMINISTRATION and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
PELLEGRINO et al v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA TRANSPORTATION SECURITY ADMINISTRATION et al
as 2:2009cv05505
Plaintiff:
NADINE PELLEGRINO and HARRY WALDMAN
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA TRANSPORTATION SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, NUYRIAH ABDUL-MALIK, LAURA LABBE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Scherfen et al v. United States Department of Homeland Security et al
as 3:2008cv01554
Plaintiff:
Erich Scherfen, Erich Scherfen, Rubina Tareen and others
Defendant:
United States Department of Homeland Security, Michael Chertoff, Federal Bureau of Investigation and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
