Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2022cv01614
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Mason v. Love's Travel Stops & Country Stores, Inc.
as 3:2020cv01078
Defendant:
Love's Travel Stops & Country Stores, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Ralph Mason
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv00585
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Moore v. Howard et al
as 3:2018cv00816
Defendant:
Crown Health Care Laundry Services, LLC, Love's Travel Stops & Country Stores, Inc., Roy Horton and others
Plaintiff:
Jim C. Moore
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv00640
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wright v. Love's Travel Stops & Country Stores Inc
as 4:2017cv00539
Petitioner:
Brett Wright
Defendant:
Love's Travel Stops & Country Stores Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Fuchsberger v. Love's Travel Stop & Country Stores, Inc. et al
as 3:2016cv00545
Plaintiff:
Julia Ann Fuchsberger
Defendant:
Love's Travel Stop & Country Stores, Inc. , Hayden Brett Thomas , W & W Truck and Trailer, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Cole v. Love's Travel Stops & County Stores, Inc.
as 3:2015cv01192
Plaintiff:
Charles Cole
Defendant:
Love's Travel Stops & County Stores, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Cunningham v. Love's Travel Stops & Country Stores Inc
as 4:2012cv00671
Plaintiff:
Patti D Cunningham
Defendant:
Love's Travel Stops & Country Stores Inc
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Davis et al v. Loves Travel Stops & Country Stores Inc
as 7:2011cv02194
Plaintiff:
Amanda Davis and Sheddquetta Johnson
Defendant:
Loves Travel Stops & Country Stores Inc
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
