Antitrust Cases
Cases 11 - 20 of 23
Concord Auto Body, Inc v. State Farm Mutual Automobile I, et al
as 15-14180
Not Classified By Court: SERVICE, WASHINGTON LEGAL FOUNDATION and CHAMBER OF COMMERCE OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellee: PROGRESSIVE CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY, PROGRESSIVE NORTHWESTERN INSURANCE COMPANY, LM GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: CONCORD AUTO BODY, INC
Lee Pappas Body Shop, Inc., et al v. State Farm Mutual Automobile I, et al
as 15-14179
Not Classified By Court: SERVICE, WASHINGTON LEGAL FOUNDATION and CHAMBER OF COMMERCE OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellee: LM GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY, ESURANCE PROPERTY & CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY, ELEPHANT INSURANCE COMPANY and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: WHITEFORD COLLISION AND REFINISHING, INC., ART WALKER AUTO SERVICES, INC., DAVID C. BROSIUS, d.b.a. Martins Auto Body Works, inc. and others
Leif's Auto Collision Centers, LLC v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company of Oregon et al
as 3:2014cv01777
Defendant: Hartford Accident and Indemnity Company, Travelers Commercial Insurance Company, American National Property and Casualty Company and others
Plaintiff: Leif's Auto Collision Centers, LLC an Oregon limited liability company doing business as Leif's Auto Collision Centers
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Lee Pappas Body Shop, Inc., et al v. State Farm Mutual Automobile I, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 15-14179
Plaintiff - Appellant: LEE PAPPAS BODY SHOP, INC., DAVID C. BROSIUS, d.b.a. Martins Auto Body Works, inc., ART WALKER AUTO SERVICES, INC. and others
Defendant - Appellee: STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY, STATE FARM FIRE & CASUALTY COMPANY, UNITED SERVICES AUTOMOBILE ASSOCIATION and others
: SERVICE
Campbell County Auto Body, In v. State Farm Mutual Automobile I, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 15-14178
Plaintiff - Appellant: CAMPBELL COUNTY AUTO BODY, INC.
Defendant - Appellee: STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY, STATE FARM FIRE & CASUALTY COMPANY, LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY and others
: SERVICE
Concord Auto Body, Inc v. State Farm Mutual Automobile I, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 15-14180
Plaintiff - Appellant: CONCORD AUTO BODY, INC
Defendant - Appellee: STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY, STATE FARM FIRE & CASUALTY COMPANY, AMERICAN FAMILY MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY and others
: SERVICE
Campbell County Auto Body, Inc. v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company et al
as 6:2014cv06018
Plaintiff: Campbell County Auto Body, Inc.
Defendant: State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company , State Farm Fire and Casualty Company , Liberty Mutual Insurance Company and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0001
Kallemeyn Collision Center, Inc. et al v. 21st Century Centennial Insurance Company et al
as 1:2014cv08921
Plaintiff: Kallemeyn Collision Center, Inc., Mitchell's Motors, Inc., Douglas Autobody, Inc. and others
Defendant: 21st Century Centennial Insurance Company, 21st Century North America Insurance Company, Affirmative Insurance Company and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Only One Inc, The et al v. State Farm Mutual Auto Insurance Company et al
as 2:2014cv02166
Plaintiff: Only One Inc, The , Homewood Auto Body Specialists Inc , McDaniel Enterprises Inc and others
Defendant: State Farm Mutual Auto Insurance Company , State Farm Fire and Casualty Company , Allstate Insurance Company and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Lee Pappas Body Shop, Inc. et al v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company et al
as 3:2014cv00764
Plaintiff: Lee Pappas Body Shop, Inc. , David C. Brosius , Art Walker Auto Service, Inc. and others
Defendant: State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, State Farm Fire And Casualty Company, United Services Automobile Association and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1337

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?