Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Souther v. Nez Perce Tribe Judicial Services
as 3:2023cv00246
Defendant:
Nez Perce Tribe Judicial Services and Nez Perce Tribal Court
Plaintiff:
Chere Souther
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Shoshone-Bannock Tribes v. Vanir Construction Management, Inc.
as 4:2023cv00160
Plaintiff:
Shoshone Bannock Tribal Court, Fort Hall Business Council and Shoshone-Bannock Tribes
Defendant:
Vanir Construction Management, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
Crookedarm v. Tribal Courts
as 1:2022cv00459
Petitioner:
Ian Jack Crookedarm
Respondent:
Tribal Courts
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Jackson v. Shoshone-Bannock Tribal Justice Center et al
as 4:2021cv00036
Defendant:
Shoshone-Bannock Tribal Correctional Facility Personnel, Shoshone-Bannock Tribal Justice Center and Shoshone-Bannock Tribal Court
Plaintiff:
Lawrence Dancier Jackson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Teton v. Teton et al
as 4:2020cv00237
Defendant:
Gerrit Teton, U.S. Government, Fort Hall Indian Reservation and others
Plaintiff:
Rydon Clyde Teton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Anderson v. State of Idaho et al
as 1:2020cv00152
Respondent:
US Federal Court of Spokane WA, State of Idaho and Nez Perce Tribal Court
Petitioner:
Lance Charles Anderson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Evans et al v. Shoshone-Bannock Land Use Policy Commission et al
as 4:2012cv00417
Plaintiff:
David M. Evans , Sage Builders and Ron Pickens
Defendant:
Shoshone-Bannock Land Use Policy Commission, Nathan Small, Glenn Fisher and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment
Oresco v. The Shoshone-Bannock Tribal Courts/Tribes Fort Hall Indian Reservation
as 4:2012cv00059
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Adam Oresco
Defendant:
The Shoshone-Bannock Tribal Courts/Tribes Fort Hall Indian Reservation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
