Cases 1 - 10 of 30
Andrews #357214 v. NaphCare et al
as 2:2023cv02689
Plaintiff:
Ann Andrews
Defendant:
NaphCare, Ryan Thornell, Gemini John and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Friddle v. CoreCivic et al
as 2:2023cv02414
Plaintiff:
Danny Friddle
Defendant:
CoreCivic, Todd Thomas, M Frink and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Carter v. Core Civic Medical, et al
as 2:2022cv00287
Plaintiff:
Jarrett Carter
Defendant:
Core Civic Medical, Unknown Party, Trinity Food Services and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Allen et al v. Shinn et al
as 2:2021cv00933
Defendant:
Centurion Healthcare, Doug Ducey, David Shinn and others
Plaintiff:
Mario Alexander Aguilar, James L Phillips, Anor M Peterson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Allen v. Shinn et al
as 2:2021cv00969
Defendant:
Centurion Healthcare, David Shinn, Trinity Food Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
Vincent M Allen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Labash v. Shinn et al
as 2:2021cv00970
Defendant:
Centurion Healthcare, Daniel Town, Doug Ducey and others
Plaintiff:
Sean Timothy Labash
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Aguilar v. Shinn et al
as 2:2021cv00971
Defendant:
Centurion Healthcare, Daniel Town, David Shinn and others
Plaintiff:
Mario Alexander Aguilar
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Peterson v. Shinn et al
as 2:2021cv00972
Defendant:
Centurion Healthcare, David Shinn, Trinity Food Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
Anor M Peterson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Quinn v. Shinn et al
as 2:2021cv00973
Defendant:
Centurion Healthcare, Daniel Town, David Shinn and others
Plaintiff:
David Quinn
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thorson v. Shinn et al
as 2:2021cv00974
Defendant:
Centurion Healthcare, David Shinn, Trinity Food Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
Daniel Thorson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
