Cases 1 - 10 of 62
Sibley v. Watches
as 24-855
Plaintiff:
MONTGOMERY BLAIR SIBLEY
Defendant:
CHAUNCEY J. WATCHES, KATHLEEN HOCHUL, LETITIA JAMES and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00310
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1679 Credit Repair Organization Act
USA v. Demetrius Troutman
as 23-3209
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
DEMETRIUS TROUTMAN
USA v. Demetrius Troutman
as 22-3629
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
DEMETRIUS TROUTMAN
Mareine M. Plong et al v. Stephen Morgan et al
as 2:2022cv04481
Plaintiff:
Mareine M. Plong and Brendem Plong
Defendant:
Judge Stephen Morgan, Judge Virginia A. Phillips, Matthew E. Podmenik and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Troutman v. Huttig Building Products, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv01790
Plaintiff:
Erika Troutman
Defendant:
Huttig Building Products, Inc., Donald Glass, James Hibberd and others
USA v. Randell Troutman
as 22-3144
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
RANDELL COY TROUTMAN
Bralen Jordan v. David J. Ebbert, et al
as 21-1638
Defendant / Appellee:
BADRISCH, WATSON, Associate Program, T. CRAWFORD and others
Intervenor Defendant:
NURSE JEANA MITTERLING
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BRALEN L. JORDAN
Michael Key, et al v. Morehouse College, et al
as 21-10043
Defendant / Appellant:
QUISHA BUGGS, individually, and as Resident Advisor for Morehouse College, MICHAEL HODGES, SHAWN MOORE, individually, and as Associate Coordinator of Resident Education and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
JOHN DOE 1, JOHN DOE 2 and MICHAEL KEY
Flyers Rights Education Fund, et al v. FAA, et al
as 20-1486
Petitioner:
Lee Troutman Cory, Paul Hudson, James M. Mindling and others
Respondent:
Federal Aviation Administration and Stephen Dickson, in his official capacity as Administrator of the Federal Aviation Administration
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
