Cases 11 - 20 of 40
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2015cv00185
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Kaczynski et al
as 4:2015cv00168
Plaintiff:
Ronald Johnson
Defendant:
Brett Kaczynski, Mary Pekas, Billy Perrin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davis v. Tucson, City of et al
as 4:2014cv02596
Plaintiff:
Rita Davis
Defendant:
Tucson, City of, Tucson Police Department and Anthony Kadous
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Adrian v. Tucson, City of et al
as 4:2014cv02487
Plaintiff:
Sean Adrian
Defendant:
Tucson, City of , Tucson Police Department and Unknown Parties
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Treestump Woodcraft LLC et al v. South Tucson, City of et al
as 4:2014cv02386
Plaintiff:
Treestump Woodcraft LLC , Christine Sisco , Ronald Sisco and others
Defendant:
South Tucson, City of , South Tucson Police Department , Jeff Inorio and others
Counter_claimant:
Joseph Mason , Yolanda Loya and Fernando Loya
Counter_defendant:
Christine Sisco , Ronald Sisco , Ronald Sisco, II and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Martinez v. McCartin et al
as 4:2014cv02366
Plaintiff:
Bryan Martinez
Defendant:
Kyle James McCartin, Tucson, City of and Tucson Police Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Dawkins v. Tucson Police Department
as 4:2014cv02000
Plaintiff:
Elkino Denard Dawkins
Defendant:
Tucson Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McHugh v. Pima, County of et al
as 4:2014cv01992
Plaintiff:
Michael McHugh
Defendant:
Pima, County of , Pima County Sheriff's Department, Clarence Dupnik and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dawkins v. South Tucson Police Department
as 4:2014cv00468
Plaintiff:
Elkino Denard Dawkins
Defendant:
South Tucson Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Romero v. Tucson, City of et al
as 4:2013cv01129
Plaintiff:
Juan Romero
Defendant:
Tucson, City of, Tucson Police Department and Ray Mechtel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
