Cases 41 - 49 of 49
Jane Doe v. Federal District Court, et al
as 08-16942
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JANE DOE
Defendant - Appellee:
FEDERAL DISTRICT COURT, OFFICE OF UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF ARIZONA ATTORNEY GENERAL and others
Marrama v. Tucson, City of et al
as 4:2008cv00465
Plaintiff:
Michael Marrama
Defendant:
Tucson, City of, Tucson Police Department, Richard Miranda and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2008cv00412
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Canez et al v. Stover et al
as 4:2008cv00356
Plaintiff:
Rosalinda Canez, Walter A. Canez, Jr. and Angel Canez
Defendant:
Jeff Stover, Caroline Stover, Zachary Currier and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Weaver et al v. Tucson, City of, et al
as 4:2008cv00189
Plaintiff:
Dwayne R Weaver, Essence Barker and Dana Barker Scott
Defendant:
Tucson, City of, Tucson Police Department, City of, Richard Miranda and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Borquez v. City of Tucson et al
as 4:2008cv00162
Plaintiff:
Frank U Borquez
Defendant:
Tucson, City of , Tucson Police Department and Unknown Pacheco
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McCulley v. City of Tucson et al
as 4:2008cv00007
Plaintiff:
Dennis David McCulley
Defendant:
City of Tucson, Tucson Police Department, City of, Raul Olivas and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Flores v. Tucson Police Department, City of et al
as 4:2007cv00418
Plaintiff:
Herman Gerard Flores
Defendant:
Tucson Police Department, City of and Richard Miranda
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
v. Mechtel et al
as 4:2007cv00233
Defendant:
Ramon Mechtel, Tucson Police Department, City of and City of Tucson
Plaintiff:
Francisco Escalante and Francisco Escalante
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
