Cases 41 - 50 of 61
Boteo-Flores v. Arizona, State of et al
as 4:2015cv00087
Plaintiff:
Nelson Ivan Boteo-Flores
Defendant:
Arizona, State of, Pima, County of and Tucson Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Castanos v. Tucson Police Department et al
as 4:2015cv00078
Plaintiff:
Horacio Alberto Castanos
Defendant:
Tucson Police Department, Mark Ewings, Pima County District Attorney's Office and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Larry Elem v. Tucson City Prosecutor's Offic, et al
as 14-16918
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LARRY A. ELEM
Defendant - Appellee:
TUCSON CITY PROSECUTOR'S OFFICE, named as City Court Prosecutor's Office and TUCSON POLICE DEPARTMENT
Larry Elem v. Tucson Police Department
as 14-16917
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LARRY A. ELEM
Defendant - Appellee:
TUCSON POLICE DEPARTMENT
Elem et al v. The State et al
as 4:2014cv02373
Plaintiff:
Larry Elem and Elem Family
Defendant:
The State and Tucson Police Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Cabrera v. Brown et al
as 4:2014cv02329
Plaintiff:
Javier Cabrera
Defendant:
Christopher Brown, Tucson Police Department and Tucson Mall
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cohen v. Tucson Police Department et al
as 4:2014cv02225
Plaintiff:
Paul Cohen
Defendant:
Tucson Police Department, Unknown Musgrave and Jeffrey Baker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rogers v. Tucson, City of et al
as 4:2014cv02154
Plaintiff:
Giovannitay Cassinova Rogers
Defendant:
Tucson, City of, Tucson Police Department and Unknown Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rogers v. Tucson, City of et al
as 4:2014cv02153
Plaintiff:
Giovannitay Cassinova Rogers
Defendant:
Tucson, City of, Tucson Police Department and Unknown Party
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Elem v. Tucson City Prosecutor's Office et al
as 4:2013cv01180
Plaintiff:
Larry Elem
Defendant:
Tucson City Prosecutor's Office and Tucson Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
