Cases 11 - 20 of 20
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv04409
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv01260
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv02312
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Miller v. Maricopa, City of et al
as 2:2015cv00039
Plaintiff:
Tyler Miller
Defendant:
Maricopa, City of , Mary Turner and Jeff Brooks
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Treestump Woodcraft LLC et al v. South Tucson, City of et al
as 4:2014cv02386
Plaintiff:
Treestump Woodcraft LLC , Christine Sisco , Ronald Sisco and others
Defendant:
South Tucson, City of , South Tucson Police Department , Jeff Inorio and others
Counter_claimant:
Joseph Mason , Yolanda Loya and Fernando Loya
Counter_defendant:
Christine Sisco , Ronald Sisco , Ronald Sisco, II and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Turner v. Mohave, County of et al
as 3:2014cv08164
Plaintiff:
Nigel Turner
Defendant:
Mohave, County of, David Heiselman, Unknown Heiselman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stalnaker et al v. Redmon et al
as 4:2012cv00723
Plaintiff:
Jimmy G Stalnaker and Pamela Y Stalnaker
Defendant:
Malena Redmon, Tammy Gibson, Susan Turner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2010cv02245
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Ross v. Corich et al
as 2:2008cv00371
Plaintiff:
Ross
Defendant:
Steve Corich, Lynn Bray, Turner and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2008cv00015
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
