Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01892
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00100
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv04684
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Delapo v. City of Moline et al
as 4:2017cv04012
Plaintiff:
Christy Delapo
Defendant:
City of Moline , J. Schumacher , J. Dobosz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wojowski et al v. Village of Bolingbrook, an Illinois Municipal Corporation et al
as 1:2016cv09119
Defendant:
John Tuttle , Goran Tubic and Village of Bolingbrook
Plaintiff:
James E. Wojowski and James L Wojowski
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Pablo v. Village of Bolingbrook et al
as 1:2015cv09294
Plaintiff:
Federico Pablo
Defendant:
Village of Bolingbrook, P.O. Costion, P.O. Tuttle and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv01257
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Sanders v. Indiana Harbor Belt Railroad Company et al
as 2:2013cv00024
Plaintiff:
Quentin Sanders
Defendant:
Indiana Harbor Belt Railroad Company , Dominique Piccirillo, Eric Parnitske and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Hanlon, Jennifer et al v. Tuttle, Robert et al
as 3:2012cv00526
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Lind Hanlon, W. A. H. and D. T. H.
Defendant:
Robert Edward Tuttle, Jr. and Rock County Circuit Court
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Young v. City of Peoria et al
as 1:2012cv01086
Plaintiff:
Earnest Young
Defendant:
City of Peoria , Kenneth S Orwig and Paul H Tuttle
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
