Cases 41 - 50 of 391
Schobinger v. Twitter, Inc. et al
as 3:2023cv03007
Plaintiff:
Mark Schobinger
Defendant:
Twitter, Inc. and X Corp.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
hey, inc. v. Twitter, Inc.
as 23-15911
Plaintiff / Appellee:
HEY, INC.
Defendant / Appellee:
TWITTER, INC.
Petitioner / Appellant:
JOHN DOE 1 and JOHN DOE 2
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-1557
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Shumans v. Twitter, Inc., X Corp
as 2:2023cv00073
Plaintiff:
Grant Parker Shumans
Defendant:
Twitter, Inc and X Corp.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Point B, Inc. v. Twitter, Inc.
as 3:2023cv02934
Plaintiff:
POINT B, INC.
Defendant:
TWITTER, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Taiming Zhang v. Twitter, Inc.
as 23-15868
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TAIMING ZHANG
Defendant / Appellee:
TWITTER, INC.
Mike Webb v. Alfonso Lopez, et al
as 23-7072
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Mike Webb, Major, doing business as Major Mike Webb for VA, also known as Friends for Mike Webb, agent of Major Mike Webb for Congress, doing business as Angels of Liberty
Defendant / Appellee:
Alphonso Lopez, Jose Quiroz, in Individual and official capacity, County of Arlington and others
Justin Hart v. Facebook, Inc., et al
as 23-15858
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JUSTIN HART
Defendant / Appellee:
FACEBOOK, INC., TWITTER, INC., VIVEK MURTHY, in his official capacity as United States Surgeon General and others
Gjoni et al v. Twitter, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv04465
Plaintiff:
Laureta Gjoni, Lucelaines Calderon, Yoneiby Lorenzo and others
Defendant:
Twitter, Inc., X Corp. and Nexgen Facilities Group, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity Action
Don't Tread on Us, LLCIn re: Don't Tread on Us, LLC
as 23-11681
Petitioner:
In re: DON'T TREAD ON US, LLC
Respondent:
TWITTER, INC. and UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT, SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
