Cases 1 - 9 of 9
TYE v. INVISION HUMAN SERVICES
as 2:2021cv01849
Plaintiff:
DWIGHT TYE
Defendant:
INVISION HUMAN SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Rider v. Castro et al
as 1:2018cv00802
Plaintiff:
Rodney Rider
Defendant:
Albaro Castro , Steven Ringby, Carbon County Correctional Facility and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davis v. USA
as 1:2016cv01243
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Tye Davis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Shireman v. Hawbaker et al
as 1:2015cv01816
Plaintiff:
Scott A. Shireman
Defendant:
Tye A. Hawbaker and Hawbaker Farms, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
PORTIS et al v. NATIONAL FOOTBALL LEAGUE et al
as 2:2013cv05192
Plaintiff:
CLINTON PORTIS , CHRIS AKINS , DAVID BALL and others
Defendant:
NATIONAL FOOTBALL LEAGUE and NFL PROPERTIES LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Davis v. USA
as 1:2011cv02364
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Tye Davis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv06822
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
GRANGER et al v. ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES INC et al
as 2:2007cv70861
Plaintiff:
MARY GRANGER and PHILLIP TYE GRANGER
Defendant:
ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES INC, ASBESTOS CORPORATION LTD, CAREY CANADA CORPORATION and others
ThirdParty Defendant:
MANVILLE PERSONAL INJURY SETTLEMENT TRUST ALSO KNOWN AS MANVILLE CORPORATION ASBESTOS DISEASE COMPENSATION FUND, MANVILLE PERSONAL INJURY SETTLEMENT TRUST ALSO KNOWN AS MANVILLE CORPORATION ASBESTOS DISEASE COMPENSATION FUND and MANVILLE PERSONAL INJURY SETTLEMENT TRUST ALSO KNOWN AS MANVILLE CORPORATION ASBESTOS DISEASE COMPENSATION FUND
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. WEITZEL et al
as 2:2007cv03287
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
CHARLENE E. WEITZEL and TYE N. WEITZEL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Foreclosure
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
