Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Watkins v. Alabama, State of et al
as 4:2014cv01340
Petitioner:
Tyre T Watkins
Respondent:
Alabama, State of and Attorney General of the State of Alabama, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Watkins v. Hayes et al
as 2:2013cv00059
Plaintiff:
Tyre T Watkins
Defendant:
Sandra Hayes, Marshall County Jail, Marshall County Sheriff's Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Watkins v. Jolley et al
as 2:2012cv04099
Plaintiff:
Tyre T. Watkins
Defendant:
Tim Jolley, Roger D. Center, Michael Dennis Mastin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Watkins v. Easterling Correctional Facility et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2011cv00312
Plaintiff:
Tyre T. Watkins
Defendant:
Easterling Correctional Facility and D. West
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Watkins v. Centers et al
as 4:2010cv02204
Plaintiff:
Tyre T Watkins
Defendant:
Michael Dennis Mastin, William Jetton, Tim Jolley and others
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Watkins v. Jolley et al
as 4:2010cv02140
Plaintiff:
Tyre T. Watkins
Defendant:
Tim Jolley, Roger D. Centers, Michael Dennis Mastin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Watkins v. Easterling Correctional Facility et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2010cv00475
Plaintiff:
Tyre T. Watkins
Defendant:
Easterling Correctional Facility, Thomas Bailey, Grimmzle and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Watkins v. Easterling Correctional Facility (INMATE 2)
as 2:2010cv00470
Plaintiff:
Tyre T. Watkins
Defendant:
Easterling Correctional Facility
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Watkins v. Hayes et al (INMATE2)
as 2:2010cv00376
Plaintiff:
Tyre T. Watkins
Defendant:
Ms. Hayes, Brian Mitchell, Sherry Seaks and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Watkins v. Easterling Correctional Facility
as 4:2010cv00977
Plaintiff:
Tyre T Watkins
Defendant:
Easterling Correctional Facility
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
