Cases 1 - 9 of 9
OKEAYAINNEH v. U S DEPT OF JUSTICE et al
as 1:2020cv00244
Defendant:
DIRECTOR/CHIEF OF HUMAN RESOURCES FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, U S DEPT OF JUSTICE and U S ATTORNEY GENERAL
Plaintiff:
JULIAN OKEAYAINNEH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
WELSH v. U.S. DEPT OF JUSTICE et al
as 1:2019cv02121
Defendant:
U S ATTORNEY GENERAL, U S DEPT OF JUSTICE, KEVIN KREBS and others
Plaintiff:
HOWARD WELSH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
BUSH v. GONZALEZ et al
as 1:2011cv00839
Plaintiff:
BARBARA MICHELLE BUSH
Defendant:
GONZALEZ, OFFICE OF THE U. S. ATTORNEY GENERAL, BONNIE S. GREENBERG and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HEARD v. U. S. ATTORNEY GENERAL et al
as 1:2010cv02087
Plaintiff:
ROBERT HEARD
Defendant:
U. S. ATTORNEY GENERAL, BRIAN OWENS, B. AVANT EDENFIELD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HERBERT v. HOLDER et al
as 1:2010cv02090
Plaintiff:
GEORGE ENRIQUE HERBERT
Defendant:
ERIC HOLDER, U. S. ATTORNEY GENERAL and U. S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GLASS v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS et al
as 1:2008cv00647
Plaintiff:
LEIGH-DAVIS GLASS
Defendant:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATIONS, U. S. MARSHAL SERVICES and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
CARPENTER v. U. S. ATTORNEY GENERAL et al
as 1:2008cv00062
Petitioner:
WILLIAM D. CARPENTER
Respondent:
U. S. ATTORNEY GENERAL and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
HARPER v. U. S. ATTORNEY GENERAL'S OFFICE et al
as 1:2007cv00519
Petitioner:
DON ALTON HARPER
Respondent:
U. S. ATTORNEY GENERAL'S OFFICE and ROBERT S. STREEPY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
HURT v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2007cv00037
Plaintiff:
TYRONE HURT
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and U. S. ATTORNEY GENERAL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
