Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Woods v. Corizon et al
as 8:2026cv00259
Plaintiff:
Dannis Conrol Woods
Defendant:
Corizon, F.S.P., Washington C. I. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Arthur Lowe v. Timothy McKenzie, et al
as 17-50533
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ARTHUR LOWE
Defendant - Appellee:
LAW LIBRARIAN TIMOTHY MCKENZIE, LAW LIBRARY SUPERVISOR BRITTNEY S. HAMILTON, MAILROOM SUPERVISOR JENNIFER L. COALSTON and others
Lowe v. McKenzie et al
as 6:2016cv00423
Defendant:
Ass. Warden Bruce Armstrong, Mailroom Sup. Jennifer L. Coalston, Grievance Dept. Vicki Cundiff and others
Plaintiff:
Arthur Lowe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Woods v. Suwannee C.I. et al
as 3:2016cv00438
Plaintiff:
Dannis C. Woods
Defendant:
Suwannee C.I., Lake C.I., F.S.P. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Woods v. Santa Rosa C.I. et al
as 3:2016cv00375
Plaintiff:
Dannis C. Woods
Defendant:
Santa Rosa C.I., U.C.I., FSP Prisons and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Haynes v. U.C.I. Food Services et al
as 3:2015cv00271
Plaintiff:
Michael Haynes
Defendant:
U.C.I. Food Services and U.C.I. Food Director
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Haynes v. U.C.I. Personnel et al
as 3:2014cv00547
Plaintiff:
Michael Haynes
Defendant:
U.C.I. Personnel, U.C.I. Warden, F.S.P. Personnel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
v. Haynes et al
as 3:2014cv00036
Plaintiff:
Michael Haynes
Defendant:
U.C.I. Personnel, U.C.I. Security, U.C.I. Mental Health Services and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Haynes v. U.C.I. Personnel et al
as 3:2014cv00008
Plaintiff:
Michael Haynes
Defendant:
U.C.I. Personnel and U.C.I. Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Haynes v. U.C.I. Security et al
as 3:2014cv00004
Plaintiff:
Michael Haynes
Defendant:
U.C.I. Security, Sergeant Finch and U.C.I. Mental Health Services
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
