Cases 21 - 30 of 109
American Civil Liberties Union of Northern California et al v. U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement et al
as 4:2021cv02632
Plaintiff:
Just Futures Law, American Civil Liberties Union of Northern California, Immigrant Defense Project and others
Defendant:
U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, U.S. Department of Homeland Security and U.S. Customs and Border Protection
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
Gabriela Solano v. U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement et al
as 2:2021cv01576
Defendant:
U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, Dir LA Field Ofc ICE David Marin, Acting Dir. ICE Tae D. Johnson and others
Plaintiff:
Gabriela Solano
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Zachary Nightingale, et al v. U.S. Citizenship and Immigrati, et al
as 21-15288
Defendant / Appellant:
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, U.S. CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES and U.S. IMMIGRATION AND CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT
Plaintiff / Appellee:
COURTNEY BRYN MCDERMED, ZACHARY MILLER NIGHTINGALE, CHERYL DAVID and others
Center for Gender & Refugee Studies v. U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement
as 4:2021cv01065
Defendant:
U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement
Plaintiff:
Center for Gender & Refugee Studies
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
Clergy and Laity United for Economic Justice et al v. Department of Homeland Security et al
as 2:2021cv01214
Plaintiff:
Geographies of Displacement University of Texas at Austin, Immigrant Justice Task Force, Wellington Avenue United Church of Christ, Legal Services for Prisoners with Children and others
Defendant:
Immigration and Customs Enforcement, Department of Homeland Security and U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
Satbay Kydyrali v. Chad Wolf, et al
as 21-55014
Respondent:
MATTHEW T. ALBENCE, Director, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, CHAD F. WOLF, Secretary of United States Department of Homeland Security, CHRISTOPHER J. LAROSE, Warden, Otay Mesa Detention Center and others
Petitioner:
SATBAY KYDYRALI
Million Gebrelibanos v. Chad Wolf, et al
as 21-55001
Respondent / Appellee:
CHAD F. WOLF, Secretary of the Department of Homeland Security, GREGORY ARCHAMBEAULT, Director of San Diego Field Office, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, MELISSA JIMENEZ, Officer In Charge and others
Petitioner / Appellant:
MILLION WELDEMHRET GEBRELIBANOS
Pangea Legal Services, et al v. USDHS, et al
as 20-17490
Defendant / Appellant:
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, KENNETH T. CUCCINELLI, Deputy Secretary of the Department of Homeland Security, JAMES MCHENRY, Director of the Executive Office for Immigration Review and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
CATHOLIC LEGAL IMMIGRATION NETWORK, INC., DOLORES STREET COMMUNITY SERVICES, CAPITAL AREA IMMIGRANTS' RIGHTS COALITION and others
Amicus Curiae:
IMMIGRATION REFORM LAW INSTITUTE
Pangea Legal Services et al v. U.S. Department of Homeland Security et al
as 3:2020cv09253
Plaintiff:
Catholic Legal Immigration Network, Inc., Capital Area Immigrants' Rights Coalition, Dolores Street Community Services, Inc. and others
Defendant:
U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, Tony H. Pham, Kenneth T. Cuccinelli and others
Amicus Curiae:
Members of the Board of Immigration Appeals, Kids in Need of Defense, Immigration Law Professors and others
Petitioner:
Immigration Equality
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Kelvin Hernandez Roman, et al v. Chad Wolf, et al
as 20-56329
Petitioner:
MIGUEL AGUILAR ESTRADA, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, BEATRIZ ANDREA FORERO CHAVEZ and KELVIN HERNANDEZ ROMAN
Respondent:
MATTHEW T. ALBENCE, Deputy Director and Senior Official Performing the Duties of the Director, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, DAVID MARIN, Director of the Los Angeles Field Office, Enforcement and Removal Operations, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, JAMES JANECKA, Warden, Adelanto ICE Processing Center and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
