Cases 1 - 10 of 13
VURIMINDI v. MORGAN et al
as 2:2023cv03282
Petitioner:
VAMSIDHAR VURIMINDI
Respondent:
ERIN MORGAN, PHILADELPHIA ADULT PROBATION AND PAROLE DEPARTMENT, COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
CEBALLOS-QUINTANILLA et al v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY ("DHS") et al
as 5:2016cv00118
Petitioner:
FANY YAKELIN CEBALLOS-QUINTANILLA and L.Y.T.C.
Respondent:
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY ("DHS"), U.S. CUSTOMS AND BORDER PROTECTION ("CBP"), U.S. CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES ("USCIS") and others
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1105
DIAZ-DIAZ et al v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY et al
as 5:2015cv06552
Petitioner:
MARIA AMELIA DIAZ-DIAZ and J.G.H.D.
Respondent:
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY , U.S. CUSTOMS AND BORDER PROTECTION , U.S. CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES and others
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1105
BERGAL v. CURRENT SECRETARY OF THE DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY (DHS) et al
as 3:2015cv00319
Plaintiff:
GOKHAN BERGAL
Defendant:
CURRENT SECRETARY OF THE DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY (DHS), CURRENT DIRECTOR OF U.S. IMMIGRATION AND CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT (ICE) AND ITS OFFICES OF ENFORCEMENT AND REMOVAL OPERATIONS (ERO), CURRENT UNIT CHIEF, ICE/ERO LAW ENFORCEMENT SUPPORT CENTER (LESC) and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
NAZARIY v. CURRENT SECRETARY OF THE DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY (DHS) et al
as 3:2015cv00317
Plaintiff:
KMET NAZARIY
Defendant:
CURRENT SECRETARY OF THE DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY (DHS), CURRENT DIRECTOR OF U.S. IMMIGRATION AND CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT (ICE) AND ITS OFFICES OF ENFORCEMENT AND REMOVAL OPERATIONS (ERO), CURRENT UNIT CHIEF, ICE/ERO LAW ENFORCEMENT SUPPORT CENTER (LESC) and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WALDRON v. CURRENT SECRETARY OF THE DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY (DHS) et al
as 3:2015cv00320
Plaintiff:
WENDELL WALDRON
Defendant:
CURRENT SECRETARY OF THE DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY (DHS), CURRENT DIRECTOR OF U.S. IMMIGRATION AND CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT (ICE) AND ITS OFFICES OF ENFORCEMENT AND REMOVAL OPERATIONS (ERO), CURRENT UNIT CHIEF, ICE/ERO LAW ENFORCEMENT SUPPORT CENTER (LESC) and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SALEH v. CURRENT SECRETARY OF THE DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY (DHS) et al
as 3:2015cv00313
Plaintiff:
MAHMOUD SALEH
Defendant:
CURRENT SECRETARY OF THE DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY (DHS), CURRENT DIRECTOR OF U.S. IMMIGRATION AND CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT (ICE) AND ITS OFFICES OF ENFORCEMENT AND REMOVAL OPERATIONS (ERO), CURRENT UNIT CHIEF, ICE/ERO LAW ENFORCEMENT SUPPORT CENTER (LESC) and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HAMMOUD v. CURRENT SECRETARY OF THE DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY (DHS) et al
as 3:2015cv00318
Plaintiff:
HASSAN HAMMOUD
Defendant:
CURRENT SECRETARY OF THE DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY (DHS), CURRENT DIRECTOR OF U.S. IMMIGRATION AND CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT (ICE) AND ITS OFFICES OF ENFORCEMENT AND REMOVAL OPERATIONS (ERO), CURRENT UNIT CHIEF, ICE/ERO LAW ENFORCEMENT SUPPORT CENTER (LESC) and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PEREZ v. CURRENT SECRETARY OF THE DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY (DHS) et al
as 3:2015cv00316
Plaintiff:
WILLY R. PEREZ
Defendant:
CURRENT SECRETARY OF THE DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY (DHS), CURRENT DIRECTOR OF U.S. IMMIGRATION AND CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT (ICE) AND ITS OFFICES OF ENFORCEMENT AND REMOVAL OPERATIONS (ERO), CURRENT UNIT CHIEF, ICE/ERO LAW ENFORCEMENT SUPPORT CENTER (LESC) and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PORTILLO v. CURRENT SECRETARY OF THE DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY (DHS) et al
as 3:2015cv00315
Plaintiff:
OTTO P. PORTILLO
Defendant:
CURRENT SECRETARY OF THE DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY (DHS), CURRENT DIRECTOR OF U.S. IMMIGRATION AND CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT (ICE) AND ITS OFFICES OF ENFORCEMENT AND REMOVAL OPERATIONS (ERO), CURRENT UNIT CHIEF, ICE/ERO LAW ENFORCEMENT SUPPORT CENTER (LESC) and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
