Cases 1 - 10 of 36
Pale Horse Realty, LLC v. Bezio, et al
as 24-1449
Plaintiff:
PALE HORSE REALTY, LLC
Defendant:
CHRISTINA A. BEZIO and DOUGLAS G. BEZIO
Interested Party:
U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, not in its individual capacity, but solely as Trustee for the RMAC Trust, Series 2016-CTT, VALERIANO DIVIACCHI, HUTTLECORP. INC., d/b/a Re/Max Classic and others
U.S. Bank National Association v. Richmond
as 24-1342
Plaintiff:
U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as trustee, on behalf of the holders of the Asset Backed Securities Corporation Home Equity Loan Trust, Series NC 2005-HE8, Asset Backed Pass-Through Certificates, Series NC 2005-HE8
Defendant:
ERIC H. RICHMOND, a/k/a Eric H. Richmond and CITIMORTGAGE, INC., f/k/a Citicorp Mortgage Securities, Inc.
Benitez Caceres, et al v. U.S. Bank Trust National Association
as 24-1324
Plaintiff:
MIRCA BENITEZ CACERES, GUILLERMO CACERES, ISRAEL CACERES and others
Defendant:
U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Trustee
US Bank, NA v. Pike, et al
as 23-1968
Plaintiff / Appellant:
U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, Successor Trustee to Bank of America, NA, Successor in Interest to LaSalle Bank NA, as Trustee, on Behalf of the Holders of the Washington Mutual Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, WMALT Series 2006-AR8
Defendant / Appellee:
PETER F. PIKE and CHRISTINA PIKE
Interested Party:
USAA FEDERAL SAVINGS BANK
FOMB, et al v. AmeriNational Community Services, LLC, et al
as 23-1747
Petitioner:
FINANCIAL OVERSIGHT AND MANAGEMENT BOARD FOR PUERTO RICO
Petitioner / Appellant:
AMERINATIONAL COMMUNITY SERVICES, LLC, as servicer for the GDB Debt Recovery Authority and CANTOR-KATZ COLLATERAL MONITOR LLC, as collateral monitor for DRA Bondholders
Respondent / Appellee:
INVESCO ADVISERS, INC., YUSIF MAFUZ-BLANCO, PUERTO RICO FISCAL AGENCY AND FINANCIAL ADVISORY AUTHORITY and others
Appellee:
FIR TREE CAPITAL MANAGEMENT, LP
Interested Party:
GDB DEBT RECOVERY AUTHORITY and KROLL RESTRUCTURING ADMINISTRATION LLC
U.S. Bank National Association v. Richmond, et al
as 23-1573
Plaintiff / Appellee:
U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as trustee, on behalf of the holders of the Asset Backed Securities Corporation Home Equity Loan Trust, Series NC 2005-HE8, Asset Backed Pass-Through Certificates, Series NC 2005-HE8
Defendant / Appellant:
ERIC RICHMOND, a/k/a Eric Richmond and ERIC H. RICHMOND, a/k/a Eric H. Richmond
Defendant:
CITIMORTGAGE, INC., f/k/a Citicorp Mortgage Securities, Inc.
U.S. Bank National Association v. Richmond, et al
as 23-1574
Plaintiff / Appellee:
U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as trustee, on behalf of the holders of the Asset Backed Securities Corporation Home Equity Loan Trust, Series NC 2005-HE8, Asset Backed Pass-Through Certificates, Series NC 2005-HE8
Defendant / Appellant:
ERIC RICHMOND, a/k/a Eric Richmond and ERIC H. RICHMOND, a/k/a Eric H. Richmond
Defendant:
CITIMORTGAGE, INC., f/k/a Citicorp Mortgage Securities, Inc.
Saad Maura, et al v. Scotiabank de Puerto Rico, et al
as 20-1114
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAMARIS TORRES-NUNEZ, EVELYN MORALEZ-SUAREZ, CONJUGAL PARTNERSHIP BERRIOS-RIVERA and others
Defendant / Appellee:
BANCO SANTANDER DE PUERTO RICO, FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTGAGE CORPORATION, U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION and others
Defendant:
WMPRRE LLC and SUNWEST MORTGAGE COMPANY INC.
Lanier v. PHH Mortgage Corporation, et al
as 22-1684
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LAKEATHA LANIER
Defendant / Appellee:
PHH MORTGAGE CORPORATION and U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Trustee, Successor in Interest to Bank of America, National Association, as Trustee, Successor by Merger to LaSalle Bank National Association, as Trustee for Residential Asset Mortgage Products, Inc., Mortgage Asset
Harrington v. Fay Servicing, LLC, et al
as 22-1357
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOHN HARRINGTON
Defendant / Appellee:
FAY SERVICING, LLC and U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, not in its individual capacity, but solely as Trustee for NRZ Pass-Through Trust XVIII
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
