Cases 1 - 10 of 35
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00175
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv01145
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv01147
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv03595
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00005
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv05405
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv02615
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
ACE AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY et al v. JADDOU et al
as 2:2022cv00529
Plaintiff:
ACE AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY, Ana Robic and Robert Feuerstake
Defendant:
Director UR M. JADDOU, U.S. CITIZENSHIP & IMMIGRATION SERVICES and KIRT THOMPSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
APELFELER et al v. U.S. CITIZENSHIP & IMMIGRATION SERVICES
as 1:2021cv18795
Plaintiff:
ALEXANDRE MAGNO APELFELER and EUNICE DA SILVA APELFELER
Defendant:
U.S. CITIZENSHIP & IMMIGRATION SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
GEICO v. U.S. CITIZENSHIP & IMMIGRATION SERVICES et al
as 2:2021cv11123
Defendant:
U.S. CITIZENSHIP & IMMIGRATION SERVICES and Alexander Osorio
Plaintiff:
GEICO a/s/o Jessica Pomales and GEICO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
