Cases 1 - 8 of 8
EMRIT v. UNITED STATES EMBASSY OF POLAND et al
as 3:2024cv04656
Plaintiff:
RONALD SATISH EMRIT Presidential Canidate Number P60005535 & Presidential Committee/Political Action Committee/Separate Segregated Fund (SSF) Number C00569897 doing business as UNITES EMRITS OF AMERICA
Defendant:
UNITED STATES EMBASSY OF POLAND, EMBASSY OF POLAND IN THE UNITED STATES, STATE DEPARTMENT, U.S. CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES (USCIS) and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00823
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv23302
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv03478
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv02629
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv01370
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
AKINOLA v. CHIEF FOIA OFFICER, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY (DHS) et al
as 2:2009cv01010
Plaintiff:
KOLE AKINOLA
Defendant:
CHIEF FOIA OFFICER, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY (DHS) and CHIEF FOIA OFFICER, U.S. IMMIGRATION AND CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT (USICE)
Respondent:
CHIEF FOIA OFFICER, U.S. CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES (USCIS)
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
AKDEMIR v. U.S. CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES ("USCIS")
as 2:2007cv00744
Petitioner:
HAYFA AKDEMIR
Respondent:
U.S. CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES ("USCIS")
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Naturalization Hearing
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
