Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Cuara R. v. Mountain West Timber et al
as 2:2023cv00582
Plaintiff:
Constantino Cuara R.
Defendant:
Mountain West Timber, WasatchTimber Product, Thompson Logging and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Cuara R. v. U.S. Customs and Border Protection et al
as 2:2023cv00547
Defendant:
International Cannabis Bar, U.S. Customs and Border Protection, Ports America Corporate and others
Plaintiff:
Constantino Cuara R.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Santa Fe Dreamers Project v. U.S. Customs and Border Protection
as 1:2020cv00490
Plaintiff:
Santa Fe Dreamers Project
Defendant:
U.S. Customs and Border Protection
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv00537
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Hagig v. Trump et al
as 1:2017cv00289
Plaintiff:
Zakaria Hagig
Defendant:
Donald Trump , U.S. Department of Homeland Security , U.S. Customs and Border Protection and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv00771
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1105
Dixon v. U.S. Customs and Border Protection et al
as 2:2014cv00766
Plaintiff:
Terry L Dixon
Defendant:
United States Government, U.S. Customs and Border Protection, Department of Homeland Security and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1364
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv00769
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1105
Samland, III v. Jane Doe, et al
as 13-2205
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WILLIAM EMIL SAMLAND, III
Defendant - Appellee:
JANE DOE, JOHN DOE, #1, JOHN DOE, #2 and others
Samland v. Doe et al
as 2:2013cv00648
Plaintiff:
William Emil Samland
Defendant:
Jane Doe, U.S. Customs and Border Protection and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Right to Privacy Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
