Cases 1 - 10 of 43
PALMER BIEZUP & HENDERSON LLP v. U.S. CUSTOMS AND BORDER PROTECTION
as 2:2021cv02225
Plaintiff:
PALMER BIEZUP & HENDERSON LLP
Defendant:
U.S. CUSTOMS AND BORDER PROTECTION
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
Hoffmann v. U.S. CUSTOMS AND BORDER PROTECTION
as 2:2020cv06427
Plaintiff:
Karen L. Hoffmann
Defendant:
U.S. CUSTOMS AND BORDER PROTECTION
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2020cv00628
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
CIVIDINI v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 2:2018cv02986
Defendant:
U.S. IMMIGRATION AND CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT, UKNOWN AGENTS OF THE BUREAU OF ALCOHOL, TOBACCO, FIREARMS AND EXPLOSIVES, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and others
Plaintiff:
MASSIMILIANO T. CIVIDINI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2017cv00447
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2016cv03734
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1158 Immigration & Nationality Act, Section 208
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2016cv01935
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1105
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2016cv00964
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1105
CEBALLOS-QUINTANILLA et al v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY ("DHS") et al
as 5:2016cv00118
Petitioner:
FANY YAKELIN CEBALLOS-QUINTANILLA and L.Y.T.C.
Respondent:
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY ("DHS"), U.S. CUSTOMS AND BORDER PROTECTION ("CBP"), U.S. CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES ("USCIS") and others
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1105
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2016cv00069
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
