Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Western Watersheds Project, et al v. Vilsack, et al
as 23-8081
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WESTERN WATERSHEDS PROJECT, ROCKY MOUNTAIN WILD and WILDEARTH GUARDIANS
Defendant / Appellee:
THOMAS VILSACK, Secretary of the U.S. Department of Agriculture; and UNITED STATES FOREST SERVICE
Intervenor Defendant / Appellee:
STATE OF WYOMING
Rocky Mountain Wild, et al v. Dallas, et al
as 22-1439
Petitioner:
ROCKY MOUNTAIN WILD, SAN LUIS VALLEY ECOSYSTEM COUNCIL, SAN JUAN CITIZENS ALLIANCE and others
Respondent:
DAN DALLAS, in his official capacity as Forest Supervisor,, TAMARA WHITTINGTON, in her official capacity as Deputy Regional Forester, BRIAN FEREBEE, in his official capacity as Regional Forester and others
Intervenor:
LEAVELL-MCCOMBS JOINT VENTURE
Rocky Mountain Wild, et al v. Dallas, et al
as 22-1438
Petitioner:
ROCKY MOUNTAIN WILD, SAN JUAN CITIZENS ALLIANCE, SAN LUIS VALLEY ECOSYSTEM COUNCIL and others
Respondent:
DAN DALLAS, in his official capacity as Forest Supervisor, BRIAN FEREBEE, in his official capacity as Regional Forester, ANNE TIMBERMAN, in her official capacity as Western Colorado Supervisor and others
Prairie Protection Colorado v. USDA APHIS Wildlife Services et al
as 1:2021cv00317
Defendant:
U.S. Department of Agriculture Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service Wildlife Services, Janet L. Bucknall and USDA APHIS Wildlife Services
Plaintiff:
Prairie Protection Colorado
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706
High Country Conservation, et al v. United States Forest Service, et al
as 20-1358
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF INTERIOR, DANIEL JIRON, in his official capacity as Acting Under Secretary of Agriculture for Natural Resources and Environment, U.S. Department of Agriculture, UNITED STATES FOREST SERVICE and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SIERRA CLUB, WILDEARTH GUARDIANS, CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY and others
Intervenor Defendant / Appellee:
MOUNTAIN COAL COMPANY, LLC
Canody v. U.S. Department of Agriculture Office of General Counsel
as 1:2020cv00753
Defendant:
U.S. Department of Agriculture, United States, The and U.S. Department of Agriculture Office of General Counsel
Plaintiff:
Janelle N. Canody
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
High Country Conservation Advocates et al v. United States Forest Service et al
as 1:2017cv03025
Plaintiff:
High Country Conservation Advocates , WildEarth Guardians , Center for Biological Diversity and others
Defendant:
United States Forest Service , U.S. Department of Agriculture , Daniel Jiron and others
Intervenor_defendant:
Mountain Coal Company LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4321
Board of County Commissioners of the County of Garfield, Colorado, The et al v. U.S. Department of the Interior et al
as 1:2017cv01199
Plaintiff:
Board of County Commissioners of the County of Garfield, Colorado, The , Board of County Commissioners of the County of Jackson, Colorado, The , Board of County Commissioners of the County of Moffat, Colorado, The and others
Defendant:
U.S. Department of the Interior , Ryan Zinke , U.S. Bureau of Land Management and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
High Country Conservation Advocates v. Department of Agriculture Forest Service Agency et al
as 1:2015cv02200
Plaintiff:
High Country Conservation Advocates
Defendant:
U.S. Forest Service , U.S. Department of Agriculture , Scott Fitzwilliams and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Front Range Equine, et al v. Vilsack, et al
as 13-2187
Plaintiff - Appellant:
FRONT RANGE EQUINE RESCUE, THE HUMANE SOCIETY OF THE UNITED STATES, C/O JAMES W. HUBBELL, MARIN HUMANE SOCIETY and others
Defendant - Appellee:
TOM VILSACK, Secretary U.S. Department of Agriculture, ELIZABETH A. HAGEN, Under Secretary for Food Safety, U.S. Department of Agriculture and ALFRED A. ALMANZA, Administrator, Food Safety and Inspection Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture
Defendant-Intervenor - Appellee:
RESPONSIBLE TRANSPORTATION, LLC, CONFEDERATED TRIBES AND BANDS OF THE YAKAMA NATION, RAINS NATURAL MEATS and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
