Cases filed in the Second Circuit Courts
Cases 11 - 20 of 56
Reyes v. Neal
as 21-2615
Petitioner: Jose Mauricio Reyes
Respondent: Jean King, Acting Director, Executive Office for Immigration Review, Garry D. Malphrus, as Member, Board of Immigration Appeals, Executive Office for Immigration Review, Edward F. Kelly, as Member, Board of Immigration Appeals, Executive Office for Immigration Review and others
Guodoy Arana v. Decker
as 21-296
Respondent: Alejandro Mayorkas, in his official capacity as Secretary, U.S. Department of Homeland Security, Thomas Decker, in his official capacity as Field Office Director, New York City Field Office, U.S. Immigration & Customs Enforcement, Robert M. Wilkinson, in his official capacity as Acting Attorney General, U.S. Department of Justice and others
Petitioner: Mercedes Guodoy Arana
Rodriguez v. Garland
as 21-272
Respondent / Appellee: Thomas E. Feeley, in his official capacity as Field Office Director, Buffalo Field Office, U.S. Immigration & Customs Enforcement, Alejandro Mayorkas, in his official capacity as Secretary, U.S. Department of Homeland Security, Jeffrey Searls, in his official capacity as Acting Assistant Field Office Director and Administrator, Buffalo Federal Detention Facility and others
Petitioner / Appellant: Nelson Sosa Rodriguez
Hylton v. Decker
as 21-145
Respondent: Director Thomas Decker, in his official capacity as Field Office Director, New York City Field Office, U.S. Immigration & Customs Enforcement, Acting Secretary Chad F. Wolf, in his official capacity as Acting Secretary, U.S. Department of Homeland Security, Acting Attorney General Monty Wilkinson, in his official capacity as Attorney General, U.S. Department of Justice and others
Petitioner: Gabrae Hylton
Gabriel v. ICE et al
as 1:2021cv00200
Defendant: Megan Foote Monsky, Chad Wolf, ICE and others
Plaintiff: Jocelyn Gabriel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Martinez Roman v. Decker
as 20-3974
Respondent: Chad F. Wolf, in his official capacity as Acting Secretary, U.S. Department of Homeland Security, Thomas Decker, in his official capacity as Field Office Director, New York City Field Office, U.S. Immigration & Customs Enforcement and William P. Barr, in his official capacity as Attorney General, U.S. Department of Justice
Petitioner: Marco Antonio Martinez Roman
Rodriguez v. Decker
as 20-3735
Respondent: Chad F. Wolf, in his official capacity as Acting Secretary, U.S. Department of Homeland Security, Thomas Decker, in his official capacity as Field Office Director, New York City Field Office, U.S. Immigration & Customs Enforcement and William P. Barr
Petitioner: Marvin Nolasco Rodriguez
Ferreyra v. Decker We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 20-3437
Respondent: Acting Secretary Chad F. Wolf, in his official capacity as Acting Secretary, U.S. Department of Homeland Security and Director Thomas Decker, in his official capacity as Director of the New York Field Office of U.S. Immigrations & Customs Enforcement
Petitioner: Henry Ferreyra, Rolando Oshane Villiers, Jefferson Denizard and others
Brathwaite v. Barr
as 20-3502
Respondent / Appellee: Thomas E. Feeley, in his official capacity as Field Office Director, Buffalo Field Office, U.S. Immigration & Customs Enforcement, William P. Barr, in his official capacity as Attorney General, U.S. Department of Justice, Chad F. Wolf, in his official capacity as Acting Secretary, U.S. Department of Homeland Security and others
Petitioner / Appellant: Aldwin Brathwaite
Doe v. Decker
as 20-3449
Respondent: Chad F. Wolf, in his official capacity as Acting Secretary, U.S. Department of Homeland Security, Thomas Decker, in his official capacity as Director of the New York Field Office of U.S. Immigrations & Customs Enforcement and William P. Barr, in his official capacity as Attorney General of the United States
Petitioner: John Doe

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?